2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Device fabrication on curvilinear two-dimensional surfaces using polymer probes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simultaneous pattern editing experiments were performed on an inverted microscope equipped with a computer-controlled XYZ stage as outlined in previous reports (Figure and the Supporting Information). , PLiSED was accomplished by bringing the PLE probes containing two types of fluorescent molecules (concentrations in the micromolar range) in close proximity with a substrate coated with a third fluorescent dye. The rapid diffusion of molecules from the nanoporous PAAM probe matrix to the substrate (writing or deposition step) along with the simultaneous diffusion of the solvated molecules adsorbed on the substrate into the PLE probe matrix (erasing step) resulted in PLiSED.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The simultaneous pattern editing experiments were performed on an inverted microscope equipped with a computer-controlled XYZ stage as outlined in previous reports (Figure and the Supporting Information). , PLiSED was accomplished by bringing the PLE probes containing two types of fluorescent molecules (concentrations in the micromolar range) in close proximity with a substrate coated with a third fluorescent dye. The rapid diffusion of molecules from the nanoporous PAAM probe matrix to the substrate (writing or deposition step) along with the simultaneous diffusion of the solvated molecules adsorbed on the substrate into the PLE probe matrix (erasing step) resulted in PLiSED.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dimensions of the patterns were 9.7 ± 0.9 μm (quinine erasing), 15.0 ± 1.0 μm (fluorescein deposition), and 13.6 ± 1.8 μm (rhodamine deposition), respectively (Table S2). The differences in the deposited patterned line widths were attributed to differences in the probe–surface contact area and the physical and chemical characteristics of the fluorescent dyes involved in the molecular editing process . In general, a larger probe–surface contact area results in a wider pattern feature size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations