2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.117.260401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Device-Independent Certification of a Nonprojective Qubit Measurement

Abstract: Quantum measurements on a two-level system can have more than two independent outcomes, and in this case, the measurement cannot be projective. Measurements of this general type are essential to an operational approach to quantum theory, but so far, the nonprojective character of a measurement could only be verified experimentally by already assuming a specific quantum model of parts of the experimental setup. Here, we overcome this restriction by using a device-independent approach. In an experiment on pairs … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These lower bounds were verified to be achieved with projective measurements up to machine precision. The results show that the obtained upper bounds are either optimal or close to optimal, depending on d. In analogy with previous works [32][33][34][35][36], we find that the gap between optimal quantum correlations and those obtained under projective measurements is small.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These lower bounds were verified to be achieved with projective measurements up to machine precision. The results show that the obtained upper bounds are either optimal or close to optimal, depending on d. In analogy with previous works [32][33][34][35][36], we find that the gap between optimal quantum correlations and those obtained under projective measurements is small.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…To this end, we introduce a family of CCPs, prove that they enable self-tests of d-dimensional symmetric informationally complete (SIC) POVMs, then use symmetrised semidefinite relaxations to bound the correlations attainable under projective measurements. This allows us to go beyond previously studied qubit systems [32][33][34][35][36] and robustly certify the nonprojectiveness of SIC-POVMs subject to imperfections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As discussed in Section II.C.2, there is numerical evidence that two-qubit states which are unsteerable for projective measurements are also unsteerable for POVMs (Nguyen et al, 2019). Concerning Bell nonlocality, in (Gómez et al, 2016;Vértesi and Bene, 2010) Bell inequalities have been presented, for which the maximal violation requires POVMs, but this does not imply that the states leading to this violation do not violate also some Bell inequality for projective measurements.…”
Section: A Hierarchy Of Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible way to circumvent this problem is to consider a Bell scenario with quantum systems of bounded Hilbert space dimension. In particular, Refs [12,22] recently reported the experimental certification of a non-projective measurement in a Bell experiment assuming qubits. However, these experiments do not represent selftests, as they certify the non-projective character of a measurement, but not how it relates to a specific target POVM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%