Device mobility management in content-centric networking

Lee, Jihoon; Cho, Sungrae; Kim, Daeyoub

doi:10.1109/mcom.2012.6384448

Cited by 104 publications

(57 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Among the mobility management protocols proposed for ICN [5,6,18,21,23,24,30,34], Kite [34] is the only one that takes into account security in its design and protects the network against prefix hijacking. Specifically, authors propose to sign traced interests (which corresponds to our Interest Updates) using the producer's private key, in order to handle mobility in a secure fashion.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Secure producer mobility in information-centric network

Compagno

Zeng

Muscariello

et al. 2017

Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Information-Centric Networking

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the fundamental requirements of the next generation 5G networks is to support seamless mobility over an heterogeneous access network by design. The shift from host-based to contentbased location-independent communication makes InformationCentric Networking (ICN) an appealing technology to provide not only mobility, but also security and storage as native properties of the network architecture.Previous work in ICN literature focused on name-based mobility management solutions and particularly on the challenges of producer mobility, which involves an interaction between forwarding and control plane.In this paper, we consider the security implications of producer mobility in ICN and we highlight the importance of securing producer to network interactions. We focus on the problem of prefix hijacking: a class of attacks that can be exploited to threaten both the security of the ICN networks and the privacy of its users. To prevent this class of attacks, we propose a fully distributed and very low-overhead protocol for name prefix attestation based on hash-chaining. First results show order of magnitudes improvement in verification latency with respect to signature verification, the leading alternative approach to thwart prefix hijacking attacks.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Secure producer mobility in information-centric network

Compagno

Zeng

Muscariello

et al. 2017

Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Information-Centric Networking

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Most of schemes [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][41][42][43][44] adopt the PS fundamental principle to support NDN mobility. However, they distinguish themselves from the way coping with the locator and from the optimization for the MH handover procedure.…”

Section: The Corresponding Schemesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Locator based: These works [25][26][27][28][29][30] are similar in the mechanism of mobility support, just as the PS fundamental principle depicted. However, in [25], the locator is separated from the content name and inserts in the Interest as a new field, while in [26][27][28][29][30], the locator acts like a tunnel header of the Interest or a new added prefix of the content name.…”

Section: The Corresponding Schemesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, in [25], the locator is separated from the content name and inserts in the Interest as a new field, while in [26][27][28][29][30], the locator acts like a tunnel header of the Interest or a new added prefix of the content name. Besides, in [25], the producer can also piggy-back the binding relationship between the content name and locator together with Datas to consumers.…”

Section: The Corresponding Schemesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mobility support in Named Data Networking: a survey

Feng

Zhou

2016

J Wireless Com Network

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the rapid growth of network traffic volumes in terms of the content and mobile data, how to cope with these two new trends of Internet has been widely discussed. Among related solutions, Named Data Networking (NDN) is aimed to achieve highly effective content distribution. Besides, the mobility support is also one of its important research contents, attracting great attentions. Thus, in this paper, we provide a survey on the mobility support in NDN. Specifically, we firstly present the problem statement for both mobile producers and consumers in NDN, then classify and illustrate mechanisms of existing schemes based on their characteristics. Finally, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these countermeasures.

show abstract

“…This acts as a relay, forwarding through tunneling both interests to the producer, and data packets coming back. For instance in [22] the producer changes its prefix after each movement and then sends an update message to its anchor to notify it of the change. In such context, anchor's placement is critical for the performance of the approach.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

MAP-Me: Managing Anchor-Less Producer Mobility in Content-Centric Networks

Augé

Carofiglio

Grassi

et al. 2018

IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manage.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Mobility has become a basic premise of network communications, thereby requiring a native integration into 5G networks. Despite numerous efforts to propose and standardize effective mobility-management models for IP, the result is a complex, poorly flexible set of mechanisms.The natural support for mobility offered by ICN (Information Centric Networking) makes it a good candidate to define a radically new solution relieving limitations of the traditional approaches. If consumer mobility is supported in ICN by design, in virtue of its connectionless pull-based communication model, producer mobility is still an open challenge.In this work, we look at two prominent ICN architectures, CCN (Content Centric Networking) and NDN (Named Data Networking) and we propose MAP-Me, an anchor-less solution to manage micro-mobility of content producers via a namebased CCN/NDN data plane, with support for latency-sensitive streaming applications. We analyze MAP-Me performance and provide guarantees of correctness, stability, and bounded stretch, which we verify on real ISP topologies. Finally, we set up a comprehensive simulation environment in NDNSim 2.1 for MAPMe evaluation and comparison against the existing classes of solutions, including a realistic trace-driven car-mobility pattern under a 802.11n radio access. The results are encouraging and highlight the superiority of MAP-Me in terms of user performance and network cost metrics. All the code is available as open-source.

show abstract

Device mobility management in content-centric networking

Cited by 104 publications

References 9 publications

Secure producer mobility in information-centric network

Secure producer mobility in information-centric network

Mobility support in Named Data Networking: a survey

MAP-Me: Managing Anchor-Less Producer Mobility in Content-Centric Networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About