16th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC 2011) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/aspdac.2011.5722274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Device-parameter estimation with on-chip variation sensors considering random variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimation error in the worst-case scenario was 12.7% for all simulated cases. Compared with the ring-oscillator (RO) based sensor design in CMOS technology shown in [33], the worst-case estimation error is improved by 1.6X, and the total number of devices required in on-chip sensors is reduced by 40X.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation error in the worst-case scenario was 12.7% for all simulated cases. Compared with the ring-oscillator (RO) based sensor design in CMOS technology shown in [33], the worst-case estimation error is improved by 1.6X, and the total number of devices required in on-chip sensors is reduced by 40X.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with the above fact, we have proposed a deviceparameter extraction method considering random variations explicitly and demonstrated that the proposed method can accurately estimate both of global and random variations [18]. This method is based on MLE (Maximum Likelihood Estimation) and extracts not only D2D parameter variations but also standard deviations of random variations.…”
Section: On-chip Variation Sensors For Device-parameter Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, ΔG x denotes global variability, and ΔR x corresponds to random variation of parameter x. Please see [18] for details including sensor structures. Table I lists the averages of the absolute estimation errors of ΔG x from the given variations.…”
Section: On-chip Variation Sensors For Device-parameter Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the prior research [8], [9], the condition number of a matrix is used as the metric. The condition number of a matrix M , cond(M ), is mathematically defined as follows [10], [11], T , Jacobian matrix J (ΔG x ) is expressed as follows.…”
Section: Objective Function For Pursuing a Combination Of Sensitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reconfiguration capability helps reduce silicon area necessary for the sensor, since the necessary number of RO types is reduced from n to 1. Here, to be precise, the structure of sensitivity-reconfigurable RO itself is presented in [8], [9]. However, it is used as one of ROs that provide a specific sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%