2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1055-0_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Device Testing and Programming at Implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The definition of the safety margin to ensure successful defibrillation by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shock is often taken for granted, and historically it has generally been considered that a programmed value of 10 J above the defibrillation threshold (DFT) is a useful rule of thumb accepted clinically. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] However, a number of other definitions have been proposed for the defibrillation "safety margin" of ICDs. This has created confusion in the understanding and teaching of the basic concepts of ICD therapy and has highlighted the need for standardized terminology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of the safety margin to ensure successful defibrillation by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shock is often taken for granted, and historically it has generally been considered that a programmed value of 10 J above the defibrillation threshold (DFT) is a useful rule of thumb accepted clinically. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] However, a number of other definitions have been proposed for the defibrillation "safety margin" of ICDs. This has created confusion in the understanding and teaching of the basic concepts of ICD therapy and has highlighted the need for standardized terminology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%