2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-009-0291-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeviceNet network health monitoring using physical layer parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The features extracted from the physical layer signals in3 can be grouped into three categories. Dominant state features.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The features extracted from the physical layer signals in3 can be grouped into three categories. Dominant state features.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, as indicated in Reference1, the reliability of a network has a great and profound impact on the performance of the networked automation system. The reliability of an industrial network can be affected by several factors including the electromagnetic interferences (EMI), cable defects, network bandwidth overuse as well as other factors2, 3. The growing complexity of distributed automation systems has led to the need to develop network health monitoring tools for network reliability assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lei et al . have studied the health evaluation method of the controller area network (CAN) . A gaussian mixture model has been built based on the waveform features sampled from the normal condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle the challenges, a dynamic ensemble selection system (DESS) that guarantees detection performance and robustness is proposed. The DESS for anomaly detection method consists of four successive steps: first, since the physical-layer of the CAN protocol contains most of the network performance and failure information [10]- [13], feature sets extracted from the physical-layer information are divided into separate training, validation, and testing sets in different fault types. Second, multiple base classifiers are generated, and the individual output and support function are adjusted for the more advanced combining rule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%