2007
DOI: 10.1177/0115426507022004412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Devices and Techniques for Bedside Enteral Feeding Tube Placement

Abstract: Enteral feedings are an integral part of care for many hospitalized patients. Accessing the gastrointestinal (GI) tract safely and in a timely manner can be challenging. Various techniques and devices to enhance the safety of bedside feeding tube placement are available for clinicians. Three specific devices are highlighted, including the colorimetric CO(2) detector (CCD), a magnetically guided feeding tube (MGFT), and the electromagnetic tube placement device (ETPD). The CO(2) detector is applied to detect th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatives to blind placement include nurse-driven methods such as the colorimetric carbon dioxide detector, the magnetically guided feeding tube, and the electromagnetic placement device. 56 The colorimetric device is used to detect the presence or absence of carbon dioxide, allowing the clinician to determine gastric versus lung placement of the feeding tube. 56 The magnetically guided feeding tube uses a magnetic device to lead the feeding tube through the gastrointestinal tract into the intestine and has been used successfully to ensure postpyloric placement.…”
Section: Consideration Of Postpyloric Feeding Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatives to blind placement include nurse-driven methods such as the colorimetric carbon dioxide detector, the magnetically guided feeding tube, and the electromagnetic placement device. 56 The colorimetric device is used to detect the presence or absence of carbon dioxide, allowing the clinician to determine gastric versus lung placement of the feeding tube. 56 The magnetically guided feeding tube uses a magnetic device to lead the feeding tube through the gastrointestinal tract into the intestine and has been used successfully to ensure postpyloric placement.…”
Section: Consideration Of Postpyloric Feeding Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been sought in order to confirm the position of the tube. 10,11 Relying on cough reflex is not recommended for patients who are either sedated or intubated for they are likely to have decreased or absent cough reflexes. 12 Visual inspection of aspirate, palpation of the epigastrium, and auscultation during air insufflation are all unreliable methods.…”
Section: Blind Bedside Placement Of Feeding Tubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,9 Transnasal feeding tubes can be placed blindly at the bedside which makes it suitable for critically ill patients who are often restrained to numerous monitoring devices or under ventilator care. 7,10,11 However, blind placement of nasogastric or nasojejunal feeding tubes is unreliable and not free from complications. [12][13][14][15] In this regard, various modalities for guidance from fluoroscopy to endoscopy have been introduced in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,34,35 Submergence Submerging the open end of the NG-EAD in water and observing for bubbles synchronous with expiratory respiration is a bedside verification technique sometimes used in adults. 37 The submergence method may be helpful to determine tracheal placement if rhythmic bubbling is observed; however, the absence of bubbling does not ensure gastric location. Therefore, submergence is not considered an efficient, reliable method of verifying NG-EAD location.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, submergence is not considered an efficient, reliable method of verifying NG-EAD location. 37,38 In addition, the tube submersion method may increase the risk for aspiration with the patient's inspiration and is therefore not recommended.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%