2018
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Devil in the detail of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CFSPID is a common problem occurring with mutation analysis-based CF screening strategies. This has led to the widespread view that the individual’s phenotype rather than an equivocal genotype should be treated [ 27 ]. On the other hand, taking into account the successful reduction of CF rates by effective carrier screening strategies [ 28 ], a lack of carrier detection could also be regarded as disadvantageous depending on ethics varying from country to country.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CFSPID is a common problem occurring with mutation analysis-based CF screening strategies. This has led to the widespread view that the individual’s phenotype rather than an equivocal genotype should be treated [ 27 ]. On the other hand, taking into account the successful reduction of CF rates by effective carrier screening strategies [ 28 ], a lack of carrier detection could also be regarded as disadvantageous depending on ethics varying from country to country.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, taking into account the successful reduction of CF rates by effective carrier screening strategies [ 28 ], a lack of carrier detection could also be regarded as disadvantageous depending on ethics varying from country to country. Patients with CFSPID may benefit from detection by NBS [ 29 ], although uncertainty remains challenging for families and caregivers and strategies for the follow-up of these patients are not commonly established yet [ 27 ]. Several European countries do not use DNA testing for CF screening [ 30 ], and neonatal genetic screening is often not adequately addressed in European laws [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of additional biomarkers such as pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) in conjunction with IRT can improve specificity but has only minimal impact on sensitivity [23][24][25]. Alternatively, the extension of CFTR molecular testing to include more expansive panels or full gene sequencing cannot address the initial sensitivity issues with IRT and has the unfavorable effect of enriching for CFSPID cases [22,26].…”
Section: False Negativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CF is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by one of more than 2,000 variants in the gene encoding the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) anion channel. As such, newborn screening is now being widely implemented to diagnose children shortly after birth [2]. While multiple organs are affected in patients with CF, the majority of morbidity and mortality is due to airway disease [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%