Devising methodological provisions for the comparative evaluation of variants for an armament sample in terms of military-technical level

Zahorka, Oleksii; Shchypanskyi, Pavlo; Павліковський, А. К.; Koretskyi, Andrii; Bychenkov, Vasyl

doi:10.15587/1729-4061.2019.176411

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Next, we determined the assessment of the component of the eigenvector from the known formula for finding the average geometric value [16,17,[19][20][21][22]:…”

Section: Materials and Methods To Study The Process Of Selection Of Rmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…where W is the ratio of consistency; r is the consistency index for a symmetric matrix; for matrix 4×4, this index is 0.9 [16,17,[19][20][21][22]. Next, we determine the global priorities of RFS relative to each of the selection criteria by entering the values of the normalized assessments of the vectors of priorities for RFS in relation to each of the criteria and the normalized assessments of the vectors of the criteria priorities into the table.…”

Section: Materials and Methods To Study The Process Of Selection Of Rmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Study [21] devised a procedure for comparative evaluation of variants of the weapons sample according to a set of characteristics that define its military-technical level. The use of cluster analysis, expert evaluation, and a hierarchy analysis method in the cited study is due to the need to operate a relatively large number of characteristics (requirements).…”

Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Devising a procedure for justifying the choice of reconnaissance-firing systems

Maistrenko

Khoma

Karavanov

et al. 2021

EEJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reports a study into the special features of military (combat) activities at the present stage of military art development. The purpose was to subsequently define the basic requirements for reconnaissance-firing systems. The features under consideration are a rapid change in the situation, competition with an enemy for winning in time, accuracy, maneuverability, secrecy. They also involve a large amount of data that must be operated when deciding on combat use (hostilities). Other attributes of modern military (combat) activities are the consistency of operations and a clear structure of subordination; independence in maintenance and positioning. These data are useful and important because they make it possible to reasonably define the requirements for reconnaissance-firing systems. This paper has defined those requirements for reconnaissance-firing systems and such criteria for their selection that are predetermined by the specificity of military (combat) activities. The most important selection criteria include efficiency, accuracy, secrecy, robustness. Several actual reconnaissance-firing systems have been analyzed in order to demonstrate the use of the methodology. Specifically, «Kropyva» (Ukraine), «ArtOS» (Ukraine), «Obolon-A» (Ukraine), «Sokil» (Poland, Ukraine). A procedure for justifying the choice of reconnaissance-firing systems has been devised, taking into consideration the conditions of military (combat) activities, based on the method involving an analytic hierarchy process. A given procedure substantiates those selection criteria that were determined on the basis of patterns in modern military activities. From a practical point of view, the proposed methodology makes it possible to significantly reduce the time for planning an operation and considerably improve the validity of decisions by a commander (chief) regarding the choice of a reconnaissance-firing system and its further use in combat activities.

show abstract

“…Next, we determined the assessment of the component of the eigenvector from the known formula for finding the average geometric value [16,17,[19][20][21][22]:…”

Section: Materials and Methods To Study The Process Of Selection Of Rmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Materials and Methods To Study The Process Of Selection Of Rmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Devising a procedure for justifying the choice of reconnaissance-firing systems

Maistrenko

Khoma

Karavanov

et al. 2021

EEJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Determination of the projected losses of the enemy when the MAS is inflicted by deterrence forces is carried out using the methodology set forth in work [15].…”

Section: Analytical Expressions For Determining the Relative Losses O...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Determining the deterrence forces composition to prevent the unleashing of enemy aggression based on the principles of system analysis

Koval

Zahorka

Shchypanskyi

et al. 2023

EEJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The task to determine the composition of forces to deter the enemy from starting aggression, that is, to prevent the hot phase of a military conflict, refers to poorly structured problems in the presence of significant uncertainty. This leads to the application of the methodology of system analysis in solving the task. The set of deterrence forces to defeat the enemy is considered as a complex military system, which is the object of this study. To determine the composition of the enemy's deterrence forces from unleashing armed aggression, this paper reports a devised methodology. The procedure criterion is the effectiveness of deterrence, which is determined by the required ratio of the combat potentials of the aviation of the opposing sides at the end of hostilities. According to the methodology of system analysis, the procedure is based on the formation of options for the composition of enemy forces and the composition of deterrence forces, assessing the effectiveness of their use during hostilities. The effectiveness of the use of forces of opposing parties is assessed by using the method of iterations and methods of queuing theory. Based on the results of the effectiveness assessment, the selection of options for the composition of the deterrence forces is carried out, for which the condition for ensuring the necessary ratio of the combat potentials of the aviation of the parties at the end of hostilities is met. The rational version of the composition of the deterrence forces from those selected is determined by using the taxonomy method, which has made it possible to solve the problem under study. The rational option determines the combat potentials of the components of the deterrence forces, which correspond to the number of units in their composition. The above methodology should be used by state and military authorities when planning the creation of enemy deterrence forces against unleashing armed aggression. The application of the procedure is shown in an illustrative example

show abstract