1991
DOI: 10.2118/19311-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Devonian Shale Gas Production: Mechanisms and Simple Models

Abstract: We show that, even without consideration of their special storage and flow properties, Devonian shales are special cases of dual porosity. We also show that, while neglecting these properties in the short term is appropriate, such neglect in the long term will result in an underestimation of production.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adsorbed gas can be desorbed and transported only through the small-pore networks, which therefore constrains production. Because of the low permeability, diffusion in these small pores can be an important transport process (Kucuk and Sawyer 1980;Kuuskraa and Sedwick 1985;Soeder 1988;Carison and Mercer 1991); however, direct measurement of diffusion has not been reported for shale rocks. Therefore, more work on diffusion in small pores (<5-10 nm) is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorbed gas can be desorbed and transported only through the small-pore networks, which therefore constrains production. Because of the low permeability, diffusion in these small pores can be an important transport process (Kucuk and Sawyer 1980;Kuuskraa and Sedwick 1985;Soeder 1988;Carison and Mercer 1991); however, direct measurement of diffusion has not been reported for shale rocks. Therefore, more work on diffusion in small pores (<5-10 nm) is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both of them ignored the effect of diffusive flow. Carlson and Mercer (1991) described desorption behavior of shale gas by Langmuir isotherm theory and employed the Fick's law to consider the effect of diffusion. However, pressure responses calculated by this model could not reflect characteristic flow regime for fractured wells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simplified systems modeling of shale-gas wells porosity systems model the fracture and rock matrix-blocks as two distinct media with different properties. The main difference between the numerous variants of dual-porosity models that have been developed, lies in modeling of the flow between the two media, and the imposed geometry of fractures and shale matrix blocks (Carlson and Mercer, 1991;El-Banbi, 1998;Medeiros et al, 2010;Ozkan et al, 2011). Even though these models intuitively fit the matrix-fracture system of shalegas reservoirs, their idealized cube-based geometry and need to set reservoir specific coefficients such as matrix storativity and interporosity flow, often leads to a lack of accuracy in the longterm transient flow behavior in shales .…”
Section: Shale-gas Reservoir Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%