2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DevOps Adoption Benefits and Challenges in Practice: A Case Study

Abstract: Abstract. DevOps is an approach in which traditional software engineering roles are merged and communication is enhanced to improve the production release frequency and maintain software quality. There seem to be benefits in adopting DevOps but practical industry experiences have seldom been reported. We conducted a qualitative multiple-case study and interviewed the representatives of three software development organizations in Finland. The responses indicate that with DevOps, practitioners can increase the f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
122
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
122
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same forces also appeared in our study. Riungu-Kalliosaari et al [17] performed a case study on the adoption of DevOps in industry, where they identified five high-level adoption challenges. Three of these challenges were also mentioned as inertia or anxiety factors in our study, namely deep-seated company culture, industry constraints and feasibility, and unclear methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same forces also appeared in our study. Riungu-Kalliosaari et al [17] performed a case study on the adoption of DevOps in industry, where they identified five high-level adoption challenges. Three of these challenges were also mentioned as inertia or anxiety factors in our study, namely deep-seated company culture, industry constraints and feasibility, and unclear methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One view identifies DevOps as a specific job description that requires a combination of software development and IT operations skills, and the other argues that the spirit of DevOps addresses an emerging need in contemporary software development rather than a job position. In an attempt to address this issue, one of the two main streams of research in DevOps has strived on achieving a 2 clear understanding of (i) of definitions and characterization of DevOps and its associated practices [7,[10][11][12][13], and (ii) the benefits and challenges of adopting DevOps [7,8]. For example, while Culture, Automation, Measurement, Sharing, Services have been identified as the main dimensions of DevOps [10], others have described it as a cultural movement that enables rapid development with four defining characteristics: open communication, incentive and responsibility alignment, respect, and trust [14].…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as observed in recent studies, despite their growing popularity, there is a lack of empirical research on the actual practice of DevOps beyond a discussion of blog posts and industrial surveys [6,7]. Beyond very few case studies [8], the current literature does not provide much insight on the actual implementation and practices of DevOps and their effectiveness in supporting continuous software development. In this research, we investigate these issues based on an in-depth exploratory case study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The first clearly defines and characterizes the DevOps approach 13,16,17 and understands the benefits and challenges of implementing DevOps practices. 13,18 For example, some studies identified collaboration, automation, and services as the key characteristics of DevOps. 16,19 Others treated it as a cultural movement that drives the developmental environment through close communication, control, and responsibility arrangements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DevOps<-data.frame (evaluator1=c (2,6,7,5,10,4,8,3,9,1,13,11,16,20,12,18,17,14,15,18), evaluator2=c (8,5,7,2,3,4,9,10,6,1,11,12,13,21,15,14,19,16,18,17)…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%