2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dewatering methanotrophic enrichments intended for single cell protein production using biomimetic aquaporin forward osmosis membranes

Abstract: General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MP fermentation at lab scale mostly cultivated in serum bottles, one third of which was the cultivation media, and the headspace was a mixture of oxygen and methane [19,20,41]. While this set-up is useful for fast screening and optimization of different cultivation conditions and feedstocks [15,20,34,38,234,235], they have provided low gas-liquid mass transfer, and hence are not suitable for large scale biomass production. To deal with gas-liquid transfer limitations in MP fermentation, different gas diffuser technologies have been proposed.…”
Section: Fermentation and Post-processing Of Mpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MP fermentation at lab scale mostly cultivated in serum bottles, one third of which was the cultivation media, and the headspace was a mixture of oxygen and methane [19,20,41]. While this set-up is useful for fast screening and optimization of different cultivation conditions and feedstocks [15,20,34,38,234,235], they have provided low gas-liquid mass transfer, and hence are not suitable for large scale biomass production. To deal with gas-liquid transfer limitations in MP fermentation, different gas diffuser technologies have been proposed.…”
Section: Fermentation and Post-processing Of Mpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lyngby, Denmark). These were thin-film composite membranes with a polyethersulfone (PES) porous support material covered by a PA active layer incorporating AQP-polymersomes [25]. The experimental protocol for the development of these AQP membranes was described by Górecki et al [24].…”
Section: Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sediments are collected and dried before crude protein content determination (Samadi et al, 2016;Kapilan et al, 2018). Much advancement is achieved in SCP production but harvesting and purification after production remain a problem (Valverde-Pérez et al, 2020). The Possibility of harvesting methanotrophic biomass by dewatering using forward osmosis was reported by Valverde-Pérez et al (2020).…”
Section: Harvesting and Protein Content Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much advancement is achieved in SCP production but harvesting and purification after production remain a problem (Valverde-Pérez et al, 2020). The Possibility of harvesting methanotrophic biomass by dewatering using forward osmosis was reported by Valverde-Pérez et al (2020). The Protein content of the harvested biomass is determined using micro Kjeldahl method (Milala et al, 2018;Jiru and Melku, 2018;Rajendran et al, 2018) or Lowry's method (Ahuja and Kumari, 2019) Potential Organisms for the Production of SCP Microorganisms occupied an essential position in the history of the human diet, their roles in early processing operations were recognized in the production of fermented food (Nalage et al, 2016).…”
Section: Harvesting and Protein Content Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%