Goldschmidt2021 Abstracts 2021
DOI: 10.7185/gold2021.8031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DEWPython: A Python Implementation of the Deep Earth Water Model

Abstract: Link to code:https://github.com/chandr3w/DEWPython Authorship StatementChan coded DEWPython and wrote the manuscript. Melwani Daswani aided in writing the manuscript, resolving coding issues, provided scientific motivation, and revised the manuscript. Vance served as the advisor to the project and revised the manuscript.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure compares the association constants calculated based on the DEW model ,, and empirical correlations by Gammons et al The first association constant K NdCl is between the prediction by Migdisov and Williams-Jones and by Gammons et al, while the second association constant K NdCl 2 is consistent with the results by Migdisov and Williams-Jones at low temperatures, but becomes close to the data calculated from the polynomial correlation proposed by Gammons et al This noticeable discrepancy again demonstrates the difficulty in obtaining the second association constant. To correlate the association constant data, the density model proposed by Mesmer et al was adopted.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure compares the association constants calculated based on the DEW model ,, and empirical correlations by Gammons et al The first association constant K NdCl is between the prediction by Migdisov and Williams-Jones and by Gammons et al, while the second association constant K NdCl 2 is consistent with the results by Migdisov and Williams-Jones at low temperatures, but becomes close to the data calculated from the polynomial correlation proposed by Gammons et al This noticeable discrepancy again demonstrates the difficulty in obtaining the second association constant. To correlate the association constant data, the density model proposed by Mesmer et al was adopted.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The crystallographic radii taken from Marcus were mainly used to fit the experimental data except those at 298 K (see section ). The first and the second association constants between Nd and Cl ions ( K NdCl and K NdCl 2 ) were initially estimated using the DEWPython module . The DEW parameters provided by Migdisov and Williams-Jones and those by Haas et al were used as initial estimates of K NdCl and K NdCl 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation