ObjectiveExposure to environmental contaminants is globally universal. However, communities vary in the specific combination of contaminants to which they are exposed, potentially contributing to variation in human health and creating “locally situated biologies.” We investigated how environmental exposures differ across environments by comparing exposure profiles between two contexts that differ markedly across political, economic, and sociocultural factors—Namqom, Formosa, Argentina, and New Haven, Connecticut, United States.MethodsWe collected infant urine, maternal urine, and human milk samples from mother–infant dyads in Formosa (n = 13) and New Haven (n = 21). We used untargeted liquid chromatography with high‐resolution mass spectrometry (LC‐HRMS) to annotate environmental contaminants and endogenous metabolites in these samples, and we analyzed the data using exposome‐wide association studies (EWAS) followed by pathway enrichment.ResultsWe found statistically significant differences between the chemical exposure profiles of the Argentinian and US mothers, mostly involving pesticides; however, we observed similarities in the infant urine and human milk environmental contaminant profiles, suggesting that the maternal body may buffer infant exposure through human milk. We also found that infants and mothers were exposed to contaminants that were associated with alterations in amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism. Infants additionally showed alterations in vitamin metabolism, including vitamins B1, B3, and B6.ConclusionsDifferences in chemical exposure profiles may be related to structural factors. Despite variation in the composition of exposure profiles between the two study sites, environmental contaminant exposure was associated with similar patterns in human physiology when we considered contaminants comprehensively rather than individually, with implications for metabolic and cardiovascular disease risk as well as infant cognitive development.