2023
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dexmedetomidine and Propofol at End of Life in Pediatric Oncology: Trends in Palliative Sedation Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28,29 In a single-institution 10-years review of pediatric PST in pediatric oncology, dexmedetomidine infusions were used in 87% of patients, starting at low doses (0.2 mcg/kg/hr) and escalated as needed for symptom relief or suffering; in 17% of cases, symptom relief required the use of propofol for PST. 39 This latter study is the largest reported cohort involving dexmedetomidine use at the EOL and highlights the need for further research in this area. Overall, the variation observed in medication selection for PST in our survey supports the need for a clinical practice update and standardization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…28,29 In a single-institution 10-years review of pediatric PST in pediatric oncology, dexmedetomidine infusions were used in 87% of patients, starting at low doses (0.2 mcg/kg/hr) and escalated as needed for symptom relief or suffering; in 17% of cases, symptom relief required the use of propofol for PST. 39 This latter study is the largest reported cohort involving dexmedetomidine use at the EOL and highlights the need for further research in this area. Overall, the variation observed in medication selection for PST in our survey supports the need for a clinical practice update and standardization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…55,56 Furthermore, Mcleod et al found that between 1998 and 2010, there was a slow decline in survey response rates among physicians and other healthcare providers across all platforms. 57 For our survey, we attribute the low response rate to the fact that some providers may not perform PST, considering it is a rare circumstance; 39 some recipients are not physicians within the professional societies SPPM or AAHPM, and thus did not meet criteria to complete the survey. The majority of respondents were from large academic centers, which may reflect the large volume of patients required to encounter a situation necessitating PST.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our knowledge, no previous study has examined such a large sample of pediatric patients treated with PS. In a broader context, the above rates of incidence are lower (Libro-de-ponenciasy-comunicaciones-III-Congreso-PedPal.pdf 2019) or similar to those reported in some cases (Chen et al 2022;Korzeniewska-Eksterowicz et al 2014;Vallero et al 2014) but higher than has been published in other, recent, publications (Cuviello et al 2023;de Noriega et al 2021;Maeda et al 2020). These discrepancies might be explained, at least in part, by the existence of differences between the respective study cohorts and by the lack of a unified definition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%