2021
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.08.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dexmedetomidine Is an Equal Cost Alternative to Propofol in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, With Equivalent In-Hospital and 30-Day Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hemodynamic effects of propofol during TAVR compared to other sedative drugs has been examined before. [ 19 20 21 22 23 24 ] The drug was generally safe specially when smaller dose is used. For example, propofol and dexmedetomidine were compared in two studies in TAVR patients, with no significant differences in intraoperative use of vasoactive drugs, in-hospital outcomes, and 30-day outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hemodynamic effects of propofol during TAVR compared to other sedative drugs has been examined before. [ 19 20 21 22 23 24 ] The drug was generally safe specially when smaller dose is used. For example, propofol and dexmedetomidine were compared in two studies in TAVR patients, with no significant differences in intraoperative use of vasoactive drugs, in-hospital outcomes, and 30-day outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, propofol and dexmedetomidine were compared in two studies in TAVR patients, with no significant differences in intraoperative use of vasoactive drugs, in-hospital outcomes, and 30-day outcomes. [ 19 21 ] On the contrary, propofol in a relatively higher dose and with a concomitant infusion of remifentanil or fentanyl boluses was associated with higher catecholamine use compared with dexmedetomidine in TAVR patients. [ 22 ] Similarly, propofol infusion in quite high dose required more vasopressors than remifentanil infusion in TAVR patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, Kronfli et al reported in this issue of the Journal their retrospective cohort study evaluating both outcomes and cost of TAVR. 10 All patients received monitored anesthesia care with either dexmedetomidine or propofol. The authors undertook this single-institution study because research has suggested improved outcomes associated with dexmedetomidine in traditional cardiac surgery compared with propofol, including a shorter time to extubation and ICU and hospital lengths of stay.…”
Section: The Economics Of Transcatheter Aortic Valvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Sanders et al [34] demonstrated that MAC is possible for the transcaval approach to TAVR, and recommended its use over general anaesthesia. Various sedation regimens have also been investigated, with both propofol and dexmedetomidine administration revealing no difference in major complications, in-hospital mortality, vasopressor requirements or cost [35].…”
Section: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacementmentioning
confidence: 99%