2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi10030125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DFFAN: Dual Function Feature Aggregation Network for Semantic Segmentation of Land Cover

Abstract: Analyzing land cover using remote sensing images has broad prospects, the precise segmentation of land cover is the key to the application of this technology. Nowadays, the Convolution Neural Network (CNN) is widely used in many image semantic segmentation tasks. However, existing CNN models often exhibit poor generalization ability and low segmentation accuracy when dealing with land cover segmentation tasks. To solve this problem, this paper proposes Dual Function Feature Aggregation Network (DFFAN). This me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The neural network DANet [26], PSPNet [27], FCN [18], and deeplabv3+ [32] are using pre-trained ResNet-50 as their backbone, DenseA-SPP [57] takes DenseNet [58] as its and all of them are implemented with the PyTorch framework. In addition, our method was compared with other published research on the same dataset recently, such as DFFAN [59] and MFANet [60]. As the results of Table 4 show, our DGFNet outperforms other methods in terms of the MIoU, FWIoU, MPA, and PA.…”
Section: Model Analysis 431 Influence Of Different Modules On Classificationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The neural network DANet [26], PSPNet [27], FCN [18], and deeplabv3+ [32] are using pre-trained ResNet-50 as their backbone, DenseA-SPP [57] takes DenseNet [58] as its and all of them are implemented with the PyTorch framework. In addition, our method was compared with other published research on the same dataset recently, such as DFFAN [59] and MFANet [60]. As the results of Table 4 show, our DGFNet outperforms other methods in terms of the MIoU, FWIoU, MPA, and PA.…”
Section: Model Analysis 431 Influence Of Different Modules On Classificationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A dense fusion classmate network 28 incorporates mid-level information using an auxiliary road dataset in addition to the DeepGlobe dataset 29 for land cover classification. Huang et al 30 designed dual function feature aggregation network (DFFAN), a system for combining background information, collecting spatial information, and extracting and fusing features from an image. Wei et al 31 proposed a pyramid partial decoder based on an improved parallel partial decoder for more thoroughly fusing the multi-level features of the encoder.…”
Section: Semantic Segmentation For Land Cover Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all cases, ResNet50 with pre-trained weights as the backbone was implemented using the same device, and the PyTorch framework was also applied. In addition, we compared our results with those of other recently published methods for the LandCover.ai dataset, including MFANet, 40 DGFNet, 42 DFFAN, 30 and DEANet. 31 The results in Table 4 show that AMFFNet achieves optimal results for the two evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Comparison Of Landcoverai Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ample CNN variants have been studied to solve the task of land cover classification by taking high-resolution remote sensing images as input, such as these serial networks of Sherrah et al [27] , Maggiori et al [28] , Luo et al [29] , Huang et al [30] etc. However, there are still several issues remained to be addressed, one of them is fragmented segmentation caused by scale variance of objects in high-resolution remote sensing images as Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%