2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2022.108887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DFR-ST: Discriminative feature representation with spatio-temporal cues for vehicle re-identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared our method with some state-of-the-art (SOTA) approaches from the last three years, categorized into three groups: (1) Global feature-based (GF) methods, such as SN [13], VARID [12], VAT [18], and MsKAT [32], mainly concentrate on extracting whole representation for vehicle images. (2) Local feature-based (LF) methods, including DPGM [14], LG-CoT [36], HPGN [37], DFR [38], DSN [39], SFMNet [40], GiT [31], SOFCT [22], MART [41] integrate local features with the global feature to learn reliable vehicle representations. (3) Spatial-temporal (ST) methods, such as DPGM-ST [14] and DFR-ST [38], exploit extra timestamp and camera location information to enhance vehicle re-identification using visual features.…”
Section: Comparisons With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compared our method with some state-of-the-art (SOTA) approaches from the last three years, categorized into three groups: (1) Global feature-based (GF) methods, such as SN [13], VARID [12], VAT [18], and MsKAT [32], mainly concentrate on extracting whole representation for vehicle images. (2) Local feature-based (LF) methods, including DPGM [14], LG-CoT [36], HPGN [37], DFR [38], DSN [39], SFMNet [40], GiT [31], SOFCT [22], MART [41] integrate local features with the global feature to learn reliable vehicle representations. (3) Spatial-temporal (ST) methods, such as DPGM-ST [14] and DFR-ST [38], exploit extra timestamp and camera location information to enhance vehicle re-identification using visual features.…”
Section: Comparisons With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Local feature-based (LF) methods, including DPGM [14], LG-CoT [36], HPGN [37], DFR [38], DSN [39], SFMNet [40], GiT [31], SOFCT [22], MART [41] integrate local features with the global feature to learn reliable vehicle representations. (3) Spatial-temporal (ST) methods, such as DPGM-ST [14] and DFR-ST [38], exploit extra timestamp and camera location information to enhance vehicle re-identification using visual features. The Baseline refers to our model using only a branch for global feature learning without the SFM.…”
Section: Comparisons With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [12] proposed "PROVID" and made progress with the use of license plate information. Other studies [13,14] have shown that spatial and temporal information from vehicle images have contributed to improving vehicle re-ID performance. For example, PROVID [12] re-ranks vehicles using spatio-temporal properties based on a simple from-near-distant principle.…”
Section: Vehicle Re-id Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GSTN [40] automatically located vehicles and performed division for regional features to produce robust part-based features for re-ID. DFR-ST [13] involved appearance and spatio-temporal information to build robust features in the embedding space. DSN [41] utilized a cross-region attention to enhance spatial awareness of local features.…”
Section: Comparison With Sota Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Method Type Advantage Limitation [19,20] Deep learning High recognition accuracy High cost; poor interpretability [21,22] Spatiotemporal information Works well for hard samples Additional complex spatiotemporal labels are required [16,17] Metrics learning High recognition accuracy High cost [23,24] Multidimensional information based…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%