“…Second‐order perturbation stabilization energy, ( E (2) ) : The stabilization energy obtained, E (2) , is a measure of the hyperconjugative interaction between the donor and the acceptor natural bond orbitals 2. The E (2) values were calculated with PBE0/6‐31G(d,p) because, as just mentioned, the larger 6‐311++G(d,p) basis set yields large Δ Q values, unrealistically larger orbital occupancies (similar observations are already reported for analogous systems elsewhere),101–105 and causes the disappearance of donor–acceptor interactions, as we have previously observed 105. Nonetheless, the OH⋅⋅⋅C stabilizing effects can be described as π(CC)→σ*(OH) charge‐transfer delocalizations and, in the most stable structure, such delocalizations occur from each of the π(C9C14), π(C16C30), and π(C18C20) bonding orbitals of C 60 to the σ*(O61H62) anti‐bonding orbital of H 2 O, as well as from the π(C42C52), π(C54C60), and π(C55C58) bonding orbitals of C 60 to the σ*(O61H63) anti‐bonding orbital of H 2 O (see atom labeling in Figure 1).…”