2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2021.113323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DFT study of chemical reactivity parameters of lithium polysulfide molecules Li2Sn(1n8) in gas and solvent phase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We estimated the work function for S 8 /Na 2 S n species using the equation ϕ = V vac – E F , where V vac and E F are the vacuum potential and the Fermi energy of the specific system, respectively. The work function for the short-chain polysulfides ( n = 1 and 2) is lower than that for the soluble long-chain polysulfides ( n = 4 to 8) (Figure S2), which indicates that lower-order polysulfides are less reactive …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We estimated the work function for S 8 /Na 2 S n species using the equation ϕ = V vac – E F , where V vac and E F are the vacuum potential and the Fermi energy of the specific system, respectively. The work function for the short-chain polysulfides ( n = 1 and 2) is lower than that for the soluble long-chain polysulfides ( n = 4 to 8) (Figure S2), which indicates that lower-order polysulfides are less reactive …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The work function for the shortchain polysulfides (n = 1 and 2) is lower than that for the soluble long-chain polysulfides (n = 4 to 8) (Figure S2), which indicates that lower-order polysulfides are less reactive. 56 First, we relaxed the Na 2 S n species and then placed them on the surface of AMs at different available lattice sites (see Figure S3). For further calculations, we only considered the structures with the lowest energies, and the anchoring behavior was investigated in terms of binding energy, which was calculated using the following equation.…”
Section: Calculation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31] In general, molecules with high polarity are easier to attract or repel valence electrons from other compounds and undergo electron transfer, therefore, the higher the dipole moment, the less stable the molecule. [32][33][34][35] As shown in Figure 6, the dipole moments of TCNQ/FTCNQ/F 4 TCNQ molecules are 0.0031/0.8645/0.0001D, respectively, indicating that FTCNQ electrode materials are more easily dissolved in the electrolyte than TCNQ and F 4 TCNQ electrode materials. The dipole moments of the discharge products (TCNQ-2Zn, FTCNQ-2Zn and F 4 TCNQ-2Zn in AZIBs) are 0.0012D, 0.7965D and 0.0027D, respectively, indicating that the discharge products FTCNQ-2Zn and F 4 TCNQ-2Zn are more unstable than TCNQ-2Zn.…”
Section: Electrochemical Performance Of Tcnq/ftcnq/f 4 Tcnq Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Gaussian integration scheme was applied with a smearing width of 0.05 eV. The Li 2 S polysulfide structure was used in our calculations as a model example, based on the structures reported by Cheviri et al , 41 along with its derivatives that are S rich or Li deficient, and various S-bound MXene surfaces were considered. The binding energies of the sulfur atom within the polysulphide and sulphur bound to MXenes were calculated using the surface-defect-physics approach, explained in detail by Freysoldt et al , 42 as a function of sulfur chemical potential.…”
Section: Dft Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%