2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13538-021-00910-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DFT Study of Conformational Analysis, Molecular Structure and Properties of para-, meta- and ortho 4-Methoxyphenyl Piperazine Isomers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is very beneficial for predicting a compound's reactivity to nucleophilic and electrophilic assaults. Intermolecular interaction types can be inferred thanks to MEPs [28,33]. The MEP maps of the substances produced on the density surface are shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Molecular Electrostatic Potential Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is very beneficial for predicting a compound's reactivity to nucleophilic and electrophilic assaults. Intermolecular interaction types can be inferred thanks to MEPs [28,33]. The MEP maps of the substances produced on the density surface are shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Molecular Electrostatic Potential Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= 8.6393× 10 -33 esu) and (1 a.u. = 0.1482×10 −24 esu), respectively[27,28]. For MFA and MIA molecules, the computed dipole moment is 3.7061 D and 3.2442 D, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be analyzed thanks to the colors on the MEP maps. The red color corresponds to the most negative electrostatic potential sites (this color can be classified as the region of electrophilic) and the blue color corresponds to the most positive electrostatic potential sites (this color can be classified as the region of nucleophilic) (Alkorta & Perez, 1996;Ekincioğlu et al, 2021;Lengsfield & Yarkony, 1992;Politzer & Murray, 2002).…”
Section: Molecular Electrostatic Potential (Mep) Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= 0.1482 × 10 −24 esu; and for β, 1a.u. = 8.6393 × 10 −33 esu(de Silva et al, 2005;Ekincioğlu, Kılıç, & Dereli, 2021;Prasad & Williams,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%