2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DGT technique to assess P mobilization from greenhouse vegetable soils in China: A novel approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has further been stated that, while the DGT method may accurately depict the amount of P immediately in solution, it may not always correlate well to plant performance as plant-mediated dissolution processes are not taken into account [23,24]. While the DGT method is described as an accurate method for the determination of plant-available P even at low concentrations in various soil types [9,25], our study only determined DGT available P after the addition of highly soluble P species, which may indicate the limits of the method when applied to soils that show both low P concentrations as well as a high sorption capacity, as indicated through the CAL and Olsen methods.…”
Section: Comparison Of Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has further been stated that, while the DGT method may accurately depict the amount of P immediately in solution, it may not always correlate well to plant performance as plant-mediated dissolution processes are not taken into account [23,24]. While the DGT method is described as an accurate method for the determination of plant-available P even at low concentrations in various soil types [9,25], our study only determined DGT available P after the addition of highly soluble P species, which may indicate the limits of the method when applied to soils that show both low P concentrations as well as a high sorption capacity, as indicated through the CAL and Olsen methods.…”
Section: Comparison Of Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil changes affect the substrate (Zhang et al, 2019) as well as crop yield and quality (Chen et al, 2017) and can also cause environmental problems, such as water pollution (He, 2006;Heredia and Cirelli, 2007;Ju et al, 2007;Kalkhajeh et al, 2018) and ecological destruction. Earlier study has shown that when soil Olsen-P exceeds 60 mg/kg, P in drainage water increases to more than 2 mg/L (Heckrath et al, 1995).…”
Section: Soil Change Strategies In Lhasamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filter membranes (usually 0.45 μm pore sizes) have been applied as protective layer, preventing some large particles from contaminating or damaging diffusive gels outer surface. Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes, cellulose nitrate membranes (CN), cellulose acetate membrane and hydrophilic polyethersulfone filter membranes (PES) are commonly used as DGT filter membrane (Desaulty et al 2017;Kalkhajeh et al 2018;Rolisola et al 2014;Wang et al 2016;Yabuki et al 2014). reported the diffusion coefficients obtained by diffusion gels plus filter membranes were higher than those determined by the diffusion gel alone.…”
Section: Filter Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dryland soil must be moisturized prior to DGT deployment, but the water content has not been standardized in the literature (Kalkhajeh et al 2018;Luo et al 2014). Some researchers adjusted the water content at a high level (over 90% of the maximum water holding capacity) (Guan et al 2016;Gao et al 2017;Kalkhajeh et al 2018;Zhang et al 2004). This may result in anoxic condition in soils and cause the bias of the measurement from the field.…”
Section: Dgt Deployment In Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%