DHM Based Test Procedure Concept for Proactive Ergonomics Assessments in the Vehicle Interior Design Process

Högberg, Dan; Castro, Pamela Ruiz; Mårdberg, Peter; Delfs, Niclas; Nurbo, Pernilla; Fragoso, Paulo; Andersson, Lars Gustaf; Brolin, Erik; Hanson, Lars

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96077-7_33

Cited by 8 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This interaction model consists of a quasistatic optimisation, taking a comfort function, kinematic constraints (e.g. end-effector paths), contact forces and collision avoidance into account (Bohlin et al 2012;Mårdberg et al 2014;H€ ogberg et al, 2019). Miehling et al (2015), , , and Pelliccia et al (2016) parameterise specific movements via kinematic constraints.…”

Section: Interaction Modelling Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Besides the pure functionality, an interesting finding is that all interaction models describe an incremental procedure, hence simulating isolated specific interactions. Many interaction models utilise a high-level language to describe predefined tasks (increments), which can subsequently be interlinked to form a coherent interaction process H€ ogberg et al, 2019;Mårdberg et al 2014;. Some interaction models provide a high-level language as a semantic interface to define a specific task .…”

Section: Interaction Modelling Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Challenges in interaction modelling with digital human models – A systematic literature review of interaction modelling approaches

Wolf¹,

Miehling²,

Wartzack³

2020

Ergonomics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital human models (DHM) allow for a proactive ergonomic assessment of products by applying different models describing the user-product interaction. In engineering design, DHM tools are currently not established as computer-aided ergonomics tools, since (among other reasons) the interaction models are either cumbersome to use, unstandardised, time-demanding or not trustworthy. To understand the challenges in interaction modelling, we conducted a systematic literature review with the aim of identification, classification and examination of existing interaction models. A schematic user-product interaction model for DHM is proposed, abstracting existing models and unifying the corresponding terminology. Additionally, nine general approaches to proactive interaction modelling were identified by classifying the reviewed interaction models. The approaches are discussed regarding their scope, limitations, strength and weaknesses. Ultimately, the literature review revealed that prevalent interaction models cannot be considered unconditionally suitable for engineering design since none of them offer a satisfactory combination of genuine proactivity and universal validity.Practitioner summary: This contribution presents a systematic literature review conducted to identify, classify and examine existing proactive interaction modelling approaches for digital human models in engineering design. Ultimately, the literature review revealed that prevalent interaction models cannot be considered unconditionally suitable for engineering design since none of them offer a satisfactory combination of genuine proactivity and universal validity.

show abstract

Section: Interaction Modelling Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Interaction Modelling Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Challenges in interaction modelling with digital human models – A systematic literature review of interaction modelling approaches

Wolf¹,

Miehling²,

Wartzack³

2020

Ergonomics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Virtual-human-in-the-loop commissioning considers inclusion of a simulated human mannequin in the virtual plant environment. This can be beneficial for ergonomics verification [16], [17] as well as for safety testing using simulated safety equipment. Means to detect simulated mannequins in a virtual plant involve simulated camera systems, light curtains, laser proximity sensors and other, where disturbances can also be allowed in sensor simulations.…”

Section: Human-in-the-loop Commissioningmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As it is shown in Fig. 4, [19], an Intelligently Moving Mannequin (IPS IMMA) [16], [17] maps actual human behavior that is inferred from a human tracking system into the virtual environment [6].…”

Section: Human-in-the-loop Commissioningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated virtual commissioning of a ROS2-based collaborative and intelligent automation system

Erős

Dahl

Hanna

et al. 2019

2019 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to adapt to stricter system delivery and integration requirements, virtual commissioning (VC) has become a well adopted practice in industry. VC is getting increasingly integrated into the overall engineering process, where the control software is continuously tested with the virtual plant model. At the same time, collaborative and intelligent automation systems are becoming an important part of modern industries. In these complex systems, humans perform operations together with collaborative robots, intelligent machines and smart tools. However, performing VC of such complex, distributed and heterogeneous systems demands new ways of interfacing different hardware and software components. This paper discusses the requirements, process and results of integrated virtual commissioning of an industrial collaborative and intelligent automation system usecase. Moreover, this industrial use-case illustrates challenges and exemplifies the need to use the next generation Robot Operating System (ROS2) due to its robust communication layer as well as easy integration with smart devices and algorithms.

show abstract

“…In addition to the Jack simulation tool, the issue of assessing the physical load of workers has also been explored using other simulation tools, such as the DHM tool IPS IMMA software, through which it is possible to assess workplaces, specifically the time and ergonomic parameters [ 3 ]. This software can also be implemented in proactive ergonomics, in the design of test procedures for the interior of the vehicle design process [ 4 ]. The software can also be applied as a standard for the assessment of the well-being of workers via the RULA score, as described in [ 5 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ergonomic Rationalization Sequence of Digital Lighting Design in the Working Environment

Dupláková

Duplák

Kascak

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper describes the creation of a rationalization sequence for working with simulation models, and its subsequent verification in the redesigning of lighting in cooperation with digital enterprise tools. The rationalization sequence consists of 11 sequences, whose accuracy is subsequently verified on a practical example of the redesign of an assembly room of a production hall in the simulation tool Dialux Evo. In conjunction with the proposed procedure, a redesign of the assembly workplace located in the production hall for daylighting, artificial, and mixed lighting was created. The conclusion of the paper provides an overview of the benefits gained from the application of the work environment rationalization procedure.

show abstract

DHM Based Test Procedure Concept for Proactive Ergonomics Assessments in the Vehicle Interior Design Process

Cited by 8 publications

References 7 publications

Challenges in interaction modelling with digital human models – A systematic literature review of interaction modelling approaches

Challenges in interaction modelling with digital human models – A systematic literature review of interaction modelling approaches

Integrated virtual commissioning of a ROS2-based collaborative and intelligent automation system

Ergonomic Rationalization Sequence of Digital Lighting Design in the Working Environment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About