2004
DOI: 10.1021/om040114+
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Di- and Zerovalent Platinaboratranes:  The First Pentacoordinate d10 Platinum(0) Complex

Abstract: The reaction of [PtCl 2 (PPh 3 ) 2 ] with Na[H-B(mt) 3 ] (mt ) methimazolyl) affords the platinaboratrane salt [PtH(PPh 3 ){B(mt) 3 }]Cl(Pt II fB), the first example of a metallaboratrane with the metal center in the +2 oxidation state. Base-induced dehydrochlorinationaffordsthefirstd 10 metallaboratrane,[Pt(PPh 3 ){B(mt) 3 }]-(Pt 0 fB), based on an unprecedented pentacoordinate platinum(0) geometry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
55
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[13] However, experimental proof for the existence of dative bonds between boranes and Lewis basic transition-metal complexes was disclosed several years later by Hill and coworkers with the synthesis of a supported borane adduct of ruthenium in which the Lewis acidic center is linked to the metal base by a supporting covalent scaffold (Figure 1, 4), [14] a concept that subsequently has been widely applied to many other borane complexes. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Nevertheless, we conducted further experiments in our laboratory aimed at the structural characterization of a complex with an unsupported bond between a borane and a Lewis basic transition metal. To this end, we investigated the well-established complex [PtA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (PCy 3 ) 2 ] (5) in the presence of BF 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] However, experimental proof for the existence of dative bonds between boranes and Lewis basic transition-metal complexes was disclosed several years later by Hill and coworkers with the synthesis of a supported borane adduct of ruthenium in which the Lewis acidic center is linked to the metal base by a supporting covalent scaffold (Figure 1, 4), [14] a concept that subsequently has been widely applied to many other borane complexes. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Nevertheless, we conducted further experiments in our laboratory aimed at the structural characterization of a complex with an unsupported bond between a borane and a Lewis basic transition metal. To this end, we investigated the well-established complex [PtA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (PCy 3 ) 2 ] (5) in the presence of BF 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this simple analogy failed in the previous reports to prepare organometallic derivatives of the Tm R ligand [16][17][18]. Recently, Hill and co-workers have successfully reported this class of complexes to include examples based on osmium, rhodium, iridium, and platinum [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], while further examples based on iron, cobalt, rhodium, iridium, nickel, and palladium have been provided by the groups of Rabinovich [29], Tatsumi [11], Parkin [30][31][32] [17,18,35], and [RuH (CO)(PPh 3 )(Tm Me )] and [RuCl(dmso) 2 (Tm Me )] with a j 3 -H,S,S-Ru coordination mode [16,28], presumably bidentate coordination of Tm Me via two of its three sulfur donor atoms, which reveals an agostic BAHARu interaction [16,28]. We describe in this paper the [28,36], expand the pool of ruthenium-sulfur complexes with now available for the comparative study of their molecular structures and spectroscopic properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been shown in a large number of examples that have been reported over the past few years. The majority of compounds, which have been provided by Hill [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and others [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], contain either the flexible scorpionate ligand, Tm [hydrotris(2-methyl-1-imidazolyl)borate] or similar derivatives (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%