2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.018
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diabetes and Driving

Abstract: The fitness of people with diabetes to drive should be assessed on an individual basis. • All drivers with diabetes should undergo a medical examination at least every 2 years to assess fitness to drive. Commercial drivers should undergo an assessment at the time of application for a commercial license and as per provincial requirements thereafter. • People with diabetes should play an active role in assessing their fitness to drive. • Health-care professionals should educate people with diabetes about strateg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that the real risk for car crashes is uncertain or slightly increased: rate ratios in insulin-treated diabetics of 0.54 to 1.8 [ 25 ], and standardized incidence ratios in oral antidiabetics-treated and insulin-treated diabetics of 1.2 to 1.4 [ 5 ] are found. Indeed, separately, oral antidiabetics and insulins should be associated to a lower risk [ 10 ] or no risk [ 13 , 32 ], which suggests that really an adequate monitoring of blood glucose levels of patients, to avoid hypoglycemia is of crucial importance [ 6 ]. Therefore, antidiabetics should be prescribed and consumed appropriately, even those not including the “medicines and driving” pictogram.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It seems that the real risk for car crashes is uncertain or slightly increased: rate ratios in insulin-treated diabetics of 0.54 to 1.8 [ 25 ], and standardized incidence ratios in oral antidiabetics-treated and insulin-treated diabetics of 1.2 to 1.4 [ 5 ] are found. Indeed, separately, oral antidiabetics and insulins should be associated to a lower risk [ 10 ] or no risk [ 13 , 32 ], which suggests that really an adequate monitoring of blood glucose levels of patients, to avoid hypoglycemia is of crucial importance [ 6 ]. Therefore, antidiabetics should be prescribed and consumed appropriately, even those not including the “medicines and driving” pictogram.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevention of hypoglycemia is of crucial importance, so that monitoring of patients with DM should be performed [ 40 ]. In this sense, healthcare professionals should educate patients with DM on symptoms and the predisposing conditions for this acute complication [ 14 ], and promoting adequate control of blood glucose [ 6 ]. Evidently, clinicians must particularly be sufficiently prepared and able to decide which people with DM have an unacceptable driving risk and must be excluded from driving [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Small observational studies indicate that these results may follow from the rapid and pain-free nature of blood glucose selfmonitoring with these devices, which allows users to follow even stringent (¿10 times per day) testing guidelines without experiencing discomfort [33]. This research has also reported behavioral changes in patients, including better adherence to monitoring timelines, which may produce additional societal benefits, as unchecked low blood sugar is associated with otherwise avoidable injuries and a increased risk of car accidents [42]. Due to time lag and measurement inaccuracy -possibly exceeding 15% mean absolute relative difference (MARD) from matched reference measurements -users of these devices must still perform traditional SMBG tests when hypoglycemia is expected, measurements vary rapidly or do not corroborate symptoms, and when required by law [33].…”
Section: Testmentioning
confidence: 95%