1962
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(62)90129-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diabetes detection: An improved approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kessel stressed that sensitivity and specificity ''tell us nothing about the probability of any screenee or group of screenees having diabetes''. 23 He proposed instead graphs and formulas which describe exactly how the positive predictive value is calculated today and how it changes with increasing pre-test prevalence, given fixed sensitivity and specificity (fig 4).…”
Section: Example 2: Syphilismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kessel stressed that sensitivity and specificity ''tell us nothing about the probability of any screenee or group of screenees having diabetes''. 23 He proposed instead graphs and formulas which describe exactly how the positive predictive value is calculated today and how it changes with increasing pre-test prevalence, given fixed sensitivity and specificity (fig 4).…”
Section: Example 2: Syphilismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass screening for diabetes was initiated in the 1940s, when a major increase in diabetes-related deaths had been observed (Morabia and Zhang, 2004). Consequently, population-wide blood glucose monitoring was established because the tests are sensitive, specific, and inexpensive (Wilkerson and Krall, 1947;Albrink et al, 1951;Blotner and Marble, 1951;Kessel, 1962). However, a normal fasting blood glucose concentration does not necessarily exclude the condition of T2DM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%