2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05486.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diabetes Empowerment Process Scale: development and psychometric testing of the Chinese version

Abstract: The Chinese Diabetes Empowerment Process Scale has satisfactory validity and reliability for measuring the empowerment process of health professionals. Further studies are needed to test the applicability of the scale to other populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The DES-SF has been translated into Spanish, translated and tested in Chinese (Chen et al, 2011), and tested in African American communities (Anderson et al, 2001). It is an 8-item scale with total scores ranging from 1 to 5 and a higher number indicating higher self-efficacy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DES-SF has been translated into Spanish, translated and tested in Chinese (Chen et al, 2011), and tested in African American communities (Anderson et al, 2001). It is an 8-item scale with total scores ranging from 1 to 5 and a higher number indicating higher self-efficacy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Already-existing measures were used: Chen et al (2011) for measuring healthcare professionals’ provision of information; Lee and Lin (2009) and Warren-Findlow et al (2012) for self-efficacy; Fassaert et al (2007) and Chen et al (2011) for attentive listening; Briggs et al (2011) and Camacho (2011) for proactive behaviour; and Kriston et al (2010), Camacho (2011) and Chen et al (2011) for PPSDM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…may be applied to many different instruments developed in various languages. For example, although JAN is published in English, some instrument development papers are reports of work carried out in non‐English speaking countries (see, for example, Chen et al. 2011).…”
Section: The Cultural Relevance Of Research Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%