2015
DOI: 10.1097/med.0000000000000166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diabetes in India

Abstract: The clinical profile of type 2 diabetes in Asian Indians differs from Caucasians with higher central obesity, increased inflammatory markers such as high sensitive C-reactive protein, greater insulin resistance, early loss of beta cell function, and a higher risk of coronary artery disease. Mechanistic studies are needed to characterize the pathophysiology of the Asian Indian phenotype.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These abnormalities include higher insulin resistance, elevated abdominal adiposity (i.e., higher visceral fat in spite of lower body mass index [BMI]), lower level of adiponectin and higher level of high sensitive C-reactive protein [ 100 103 ]. Moreover, Asian Indians have an increased metabolic risk compared to their counterparts; because of the existence of high leptin levels [ 104 ]; leptin concentration is a significant indicator of body fat ( P < 0.0001), hip circumference, and fasting insulin [ 105 ]; greater insulin resistance [ 102 , 106 , 107 ]; higher insulin sensitivity index and lower acute insulin response to glucose [ 108 ]; early loss of β-cell function [ 102 ]; ‘thin-fat Indian concept’ or ‘sarcopenic obesity’ (Asian Indians have thinner limbs [smaller muscle mass] with central obesity, with a higher waist-to-hip ratio and higher subscapular-to-triceps skin fold ratio than their British counterparts, which leads to higher insulin resistance) [ 109 ]; more people suffer from diabetes at a relatively lower BMI compared with those of European descent [ 110 ]; elevated mean A1C level (9.0%), which is 2.0% higher than the target suggested by international bodies [ 109 ]. …”
Section: The Indian Phenotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These abnormalities include higher insulin resistance, elevated abdominal adiposity (i.e., higher visceral fat in spite of lower body mass index [BMI]), lower level of adiponectin and higher level of high sensitive C-reactive protein [ 100 103 ]. Moreover, Asian Indians have an increased metabolic risk compared to their counterparts; because of the existence of high leptin levels [ 104 ]; leptin concentration is a significant indicator of body fat ( P < 0.0001), hip circumference, and fasting insulin [ 105 ]; greater insulin resistance [ 102 , 106 , 107 ]; higher insulin sensitivity index and lower acute insulin response to glucose [ 108 ]; early loss of β-cell function [ 102 ]; ‘thin-fat Indian concept’ or ‘sarcopenic obesity’ (Asian Indians have thinner limbs [smaller muscle mass] with central obesity, with a higher waist-to-hip ratio and higher subscapular-to-triceps skin fold ratio than their British counterparts, which leads to higher insulin resistance) [ 109 ]; more people suffer from diabetes at a relatively lower BMI compared with those of European descent [ 110 ]; elevated mean A1C level (9.0%), which is 2.0% higher than the target suggested by international bodies [ 109 ]. …”
Section: The Indian Phenotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] Type 2 diabetes (T2D) among Indians has a younger age onset and is associated with greater abdominal obesity despite a relatively low body mass index (BMI), greater insulin resistance (IR), and early decline in beta cell function. [2] Obesity is one of the major risk factors for the development of DM and IR. Acanthosis nigricans (AN), initially coined by Unna in 1890, is characterized by thickened, hyperpigmented velvety plaques on the neck and intertriginous surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, many of these individuals with IGT and prediabetes are unaware of their condition and therefore are at high risk of developing diabetes complications [ 5 ]. The high burden of T2DM puts an enormous burden on affected individuals, their families, and healthcare systems in LMICs [ 9 ]. This demands urgent action from program planners and policymakers to prevent and control T2DM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%