1998
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.158.6.617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease in Women

Abstract: Diabetes appears to obviate the protective effects of female sex hormones. Possible reasons for this catastrophic effect of diabetes in women are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
134
0
7

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
6
134
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]21) Another possible explanation for this increased mortality is that younger women had more risk factors for coronary artery disease than did younger men and were more likely to have a history of congestive heart failure and a higher Killip class on presentation. Of special importance is a significantly higher risk of diabetes in women, which has been shown to be an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with AMI [26][27][28] Other possible explanations include sex differences in the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease 29) or differences in thrombotic and fibrinolytic activity. 30) Finally, population based registries of AMI suggest that the differences observed in case fatality between hospitalised women and men are balanced by a larger pre-hospital case fatality rate in men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]21) Another possible explanation for this increased mortality is that younger women had more risk factors for coronary artery disease than did younger men and were more likely to have a history of congestive heart failure and a higher Killip class on presentation. Of special importance is a significantly higher risk of diabetes in women, which has been shown to be an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with AMI [26][27][28] Other possible explanations include sex differences in the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease 29) or differences in thrombotic and fibrinolytic activity. 30) Finally, population based registries of AMI suggest that the differences observed in case fatality between hospitalised women and men are balanced by a larger pre-hospital case fatality rate in men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, diabetes mellitus appears to reduce or even obviate the relative protection against IHD conferred by female gender [4][5][6]. Accordingly, diabetes is a stronger risk factor for women than men and, in a recent meta-analysis, Huxley et al (2006) [7] found that the relative risk of fatal coronary heart disease associated with diabetes was about 50% higher in women than men.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, while difference in cardiac rhythm and arrhyathmia exists between genders, premenopausal women are much less susceptible to heart failure, and display much more favorable myocardial adaptation to hemodynamic overload both in contractile function and hypertrophic reserve (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). However, this ''gender-bias'' or ''female advantage'' may be significantly dampened with the onset of diabetes in pre-menopausal women (15). The coronary heart disease-related mortality is approximately five times higher in diabetic than non-diabetic women, compared to a 2-fold difference in age-matched male counterparts (15,16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this ''gender-bias'' or ''female advantage'' may be significantly dampened with the onset of diabetes in pre-menopausal women (15). The coronary heart disease-related mortality is approximately five times higher in diabetic than non-diabetic women, compared to a 2-fold difference in age-matched male counterparts (15,16). Nevertheless, the gender-specific difference in diabetic cardiomyopathy, especially at the single myocyte levels, still remains undefined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%