2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diabetes Prevention Program Translation in the Veterans Health Administration

Abstract: Features of VA-DPP may help enhance the capability of MOVE! to reach a larger proportion of the served population and promote individual-level weight maintenance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in comparison with recent in-person DPP trials, which have scalability and cost-effectiveness challenges [ 27 ], results indicate that weight loss outcomes may even be higher in virtual DPP [ 28 , 29 ]. One possible reason for these outcomes is that virtual DPP allows for a participant to interact with a group and facilitator more than once per week.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in comparison with recent in-person DPP trials, which have scalability and cost-effectiveness challenges [ 27 ], results indicate that weight loss outcomes may even be higher in virtual DPP [ 28 , 29 ]. One possible reason for these outcomes is that virtual DPP allows for a participant to interact with a group and facilitator more than once per week.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, participation in the VA-DPP was higher than that in MOVE! (the VHA weight-loss program), and nearly all of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Diabetes Prevention Recognition Program standards for recognition were met (9). Overall participation in the Online-DPP (84.4% completed nine or more modules in the first 6 months) was slightly lower than the 92% reported in a Medicare population (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Our study has several limitations; the most notable being the small effect size seen with the intervention overall, which may be related to the low level of session attendance in MAGDA [25]. The literature acknowledges that disengagement from an intervention results in less skills and coping strategies for weight reduction [49, 50] and other diabetes prevention programs have associated decreased participation with decreased weight reduction [51]. The definition of the PPS is another limitation for consideration as it did include reasons for exclusion that were not related to attendance and the criteria relating to a minimum exposure to the intervention was low (one in five of the group sessions).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%