Diabetes Self-Management Education for Older Adults: General Principles and Practical Application

Suhl, Emmy; Bonsignore, Patricia

doi:10.2337/diaspect.19.4.234

Cited by 58 publications

(67 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Patients aged between 40 and 65 years with at least one year of living with diabetes were included. This age group was selected because type 2 diabetes in adults is usually diagnosed at 40 years and above (International Diabetes Federation 2011), and to have a more homogenous age group excluding the elderly who could have other issues related to old age (Suhl & Bonsignore 2006). The health professionals should have worked with the patients for at least six months, and were residents of the sub-District, making them knowledgeable about dietary and other healthrelated practices in the study area.…”

Section: Population and Samplingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Needs and preferences for nutrition education of type 2 diabetic adults in a resource-limited setting in South Africa

Muchiri

Gericke

Rheeder

2012

Health SA Gesondheid

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diabetes self-management education is crucial in diabetes care. Education that is tailored to the needs of the patient is considered the most effective in improving health outcomes. Diet, a critical element of diabetes treatment, is reported as the most difficult to adhere to by both patients and health professionals. Tailored nutrition education (NE) could benefit diabetic individuals with low socio-economic status, who are amongst those noted to have poor health outcomes. This qualitative interpretive phenomenological study aimed to explore and describe the NE needs of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus to guide development of a tailored NE programme for resource-poor settings. Participants were 31 non-insulin-dependent type 2 diabetic patients (convenience sample) and 10 health professionals. Focus group discussions using semi-structured questions were held with the diabetics, and open-ended self-administered questionnaires were used with the health professionals. Data analysis was done using Krueger’s framework approach. Disease-related knowledge deficits and inappropriate self-reported dietary practices, including intake of unbalanced meals, problems with food portion control and unsatisfactory intake of fruits and vegetables, were observed. Recommendations for the NE programme included topics related to the disease and others related to diet. Group education at the clinic, a competent educator and comprehensive education were indicated by the patients. Participation of family and provision of pamphlets were aspects recommended by patients and health professionals. Barriers that could impact the NE included financial constraints, food insecurity, conflict in family meal arrangements and access to appropriate foods. Support from family and health professionals and empowerment through education were identified as facilitators to following dietary recommendations by both groups of participants. Knowledge deficits, inappropriate dietary practices and barriers are issues that need addressing in an NE programme, whilst the suggestions for an NE programme and facilitators to dietary compliance need to be incorporated.Onderrig in die selfbestuur van diabetes is essensieel in diabetessorg. Onderrig wat spesifiek ooreenkomstig die behoeftes van die pasiënt aangepas is, word die mees doeltreffend in die verbetering van gesondheiduitkomste geag. Dieet, ’n kritiese element in diabetesbehandeling, word deur pasiënte en gesondheidpraktisyns as die moeilikste beskou om na te volg. Spesifiek beplande voedingonderrig kan tot voordeel van lae sosio-ekonomiese diabete wees wat deel van diegene wat swak gesondheiduitkomste toon, uitmaak. Die doel van hierdie kwalitatiewe interpreterende fenomologiese studie was om die voedingonderrigbehoeftes van volwassenes met tipe 2 diabetes mellitus te ondersoek en te beskryf ten einde die ontwikkeling van ’n voedingonderrigprogram wat op hulpbrondbeperkte omgewings afgestem is, te rig. Een en dertig nie-insulien afhanklike tipe 2 diabetes pasiënte (geriefsteekproef) en 10 gesondheidpraktisyns was evalueer. Fokusgroepbesprekings deur gebruikmaking van semi-gestruktureerde vrae, is met die diabete gehou. Self-geadministreerde oop-eindigende vraelyste is deur die gesondheidpraktisyns voltooi. Data-analise is volgens Krueger se raamwerkbenadering gedoen. Siekteverwante kennisgapings en ontoepaslike self-gerapporteerde dieetpraktyke, insluitend ongebalanseerde maaltye, probleme met porsiekontrole en ontoereikende inname van groente en vrugte is gerapporteer. Aanbevelings vir die voedingonderrigprogram het onderwerpe verwant aan die siekte en die dieet ingesluit. Die pasiënte het groeponderrig by die kliniek, ’n bevoegde onderrigpraktisyn en omvattende onderrig verkies. Die pasiënte en die gesondheidpraktisyns het gesinsdeelname en die beskikbaarstelling van pamflette aanbeveel. Struikelblokke wat negatief op die voedingonderrigprogram kon inwerk, het finansiële beperkinge, voedselinsekuriteit, konflik met gesinsmaaltydreëlings en toegang tot geskikte voedsels ingesluit. Ondersteuning van die gesin en gesondheidpraktisyns, sowel as bemagtiging deur kennis is as fasiliteerders ter bevordering van die navolging van dieetaanbevelings deur beide groepe deelnemers geïdentifiseer. Tekortkominge in kennis, ontoepaslike dieetpraktyke en struikelblokke is aspekte wat in ’n voedingonderrigprogram aangespreek behoort te word. Voorstelle wat vir die voedingonderrigprogram en fasiliteerders gemaak is vir dieetnavolging, behoort in die program ingesluit te word.

show abstract

Section: Population and Samplingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Needs and preferences for nutrition education of type 2 diabetic adults in a resource-limited setting in South Africa

Muchiri

Gericke

Rheeder

2012

Health SA Gesondheid

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A patient-centered approach to self-manage diabetes is integral in controlling glycemic levels. 16,17 Current American Diabetes Association guidelines aim to improve the standard of care by incorporating individualized treatment for older adults with diabetes, who may be more susceptible to hypoglycemia and age-related conditions (incontinence and vision and cognitive impairments). Patient-centered communication is recommended to incorporate patient preferences for treatment goals.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The PHQ-9 has two components: symptom and functional impairment assessment for diagnosis and severity score for selecting and monitoring treatment. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 to 27, with scores indicating minimal depression (0-4), mild depression (5-9), moderate depression (10-14), moderately severe depression (15)(16)(17)(18)(19), and severe depression (20 and above). 44 The PHQ-9 is a validated measure used in studies involving older adults.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Older Adult Self-Efficacy Study of Mobile Phone Diabetes Management

Quinn

Khokhar

Weed

et al. 2015

Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to evaluate participant self-efficacy and use of a mobile phone diabetes health intervention for older adults during a 4-week period. Participants included seven adults (mean age, 70.3 years) with type 2 diabetes cared for by community-based primary care physicians. Participants entered blood glucose data into a mobile phone and personalized patient Internet Web portal. Based on blood glucose values, participants received automatic messages and educational information to self-manage their diabetes. Study measures included prior mobile phone/Internet use, the Stanford Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale, the Stanford Energy/Fatigue Scale, the Short Form-36, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (depression), the Patient Reported Diabetes Symptom Scale, the Diabetes Stages of Change measure, and a summary of mobile system use. Participants had high self-efficacy and high readiness and confidence in their ability to monitor changes to control their diabetes. Participants demonstrated ability to use the mobile intervention and communicate with diabetes educators.

show abstract

“…34 In relation to diabetes, self-care has been defined as 'an evolutionary process of development of knowledge or awareness by learning to survive with the complex nature of the diabetes in a social context', 35 and consists of seven key behaviours: healthy eating, being physically active, monitoring blood sugar, complying with medications, good problem-solving skills, healthy coping skills and risk-reduction behaviours. 36 Although SM is well established as fundamental to the management of long-term conditions, there has been a paucity of literature about SM for people living with dementia. This may be due to the general belief of the 'hopelessness' of dementia promulgated by both professionals and lay people, coupled with limited research focusing on the daily needs and lives of those living with dementia.…”

Section: Self-managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Managing diabetes in people with dementia: a realist review

Bunn

Goodman

Jones

et al. 2017

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundDementia and diabetes mellitus are common long-term conditions that coexist in a large number of older people. People living with dementia and diabetes may be at increased risk of complications such as hypoglycaemic episodes because they are less able to manage their diabetes.ObjectivesTo identify the key features or mechanisms of programmes that aim to improve the management of diabetes in people with dementia and to identify areas needing further research.DesignRealist review, using an iterative, stakeholder-driven, four-stage approach. This involved scoping the literature and conducting stakeholder interviews to develop initial programme theories, systematic searches of the evidence to test and develop the theories, and the validation of programme theories with a purposive sample of stakeholders.ParticipantsTwenty-six stakeholders (user/patient representatives, dementia care providers, clinicians specialising in dementia or diabetes and researchers) took part in interviews and 24 participated in a consensus conference.Data sourcesThe following databases were searched from 1990 to March 2016: MEDLINE (PubMed), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, The Cochrane Library (including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, AgeInfo (Centre for Policy on Ageing – UK), Social Care Online, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) portfolio database, NHS Evidence, Google (Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) and Google Scholar (Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA).ResultsWe included 89 papers. Ten papers focused directly on people living with dementia and diabetes, and the rest related to people with dementia or diabetes or other long-term conditions. We identified six context–mechanism–outcome (CMO) configurations that provide an explanatory account of how interventions might work to improve the management of diabetes in people living with dementia. This includes embedding positive attitudes towards people living with dementia, person-centred approaches to care planning, developing skills to provide tailored and flexible care, regular contact, family engagement and usability of assistive devices. A general metamechanism that emerges concerns the synergy between an intervention strategy, the dementia trajectory and social and environmental factors, especially family involvement. A flexible service model for people with dementia and diabetes would enable this synergy in a way that would lead to the improved management of diabetes in people living with dementia.LimitationsThere is little evidence relating to the management of diabetes in people living with dementia, although including a wider literature provided opportunities for transferable learning. The outcomes in our CMOs are largely experiential rather than clinical. This reflects the evidence available. Outcomes such as increased engagement in self-management are potential surrogates for better clinical management of diabetes, but this is not proven.ConclusionsThis review suggests that there is a need to prioritise quality of life, independence and patient and carer priorities over a more biomedical, target-driven approach. Much current research, particularly that specific to people living with dementia and diabetes, identifies deficiencies in, and problems with, current systems. Although we have highlighted the need for personalised care, continuity and family-centred approaches, there is much evidence to suggest that this is not currently happening. Future research on the management of diabetes in older people with complex health needs, including those with dementia, needs to look at how organisational structures and workforce development can be better aligned to the needs of people living with dementia and diabetes.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015020625.FundingThe NIHR HTA programme.

show abstract

Diabetes Self-Management Education for Older Adults: General Principles and Practical Application

Cited by 58 publications

References 31 publications

Needs and preferences for nutrition education of type 2 diabetic adults in a resource-limited setting in South Africa

Needs and preferences for nutrition education of type 2 diabetic adults in a resource-limited setting in South Africa

Older Adult Self-Efficacy Study of Mobile Phone Diabetes Management

Managing diabetes in people with dementia: a realist review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About