2019
DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diabetic neuropathy: A focus on small fibres

Abstract: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is diagnosed too late, which contrasts with our approach for diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy, where incipient disease is detected early enabling timely treatment. The 10‐g monofilament and a foot exam are the commonly used methods for screening diabetic neuropathy, but this primarily identifies moderate to severe diabetic neuropathy. Small fibres are damaged early and are associated with the development of painful diabetic neuropathy, foot ulceration, and Charcot foot.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Peripheral neuropathy is the most frequent chronic complication of DM. The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy in DM ranges from 10% at one year after DM diagnosis to more than 50% during progression of the disease [ 4 , 25 , 123 , 124 ], making diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) the most abundant type of peripheral neuropathy worldwide [ 3 , 4 , 125 ] ( Table 1 ). Diabetic neuropathy that is painful develops in approximately 50% of DM patients with neuropathy [ 126 ].…”
Section: Peripheral Amyloid Neuropathiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peripheral neuropathy is the most frequent chronic complication of DM. The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy in DM ranges from 10% at one year after DM diagnosis to more than 50% during progression of the disease [ 4 , 25 , 123 , 124 ], making diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) the most abundant type of peripheral neuropathy worldwide [ 3 , 4 , 125 ] ( Table 1 ). Diabetic neuropathy that is painful develops in approximately 50% of DM patients with neuropathy [ 126 ].…”
Section: Peripheral Amyloid Neuropathiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy is challenging and often made during later stages of disease progression in part due to the lack of methodology that can objectively detect its early stages. 1 The inability to accurately detect and stage the loss of peripheral nerves and function early has likely contributed to the failure of many clinical trials seeking a treatment for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Recently, the quantification of intraepidermal nerve fiber density in skin biopsies or using corneal confocal microscopy to non-invasively examine the corneal sub-epithelial nerves have emerged as promising techniques for the early detection of nerve fiber loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be emphasized that each neurological modality assesses different aspects of diabetic neuropathy, since other tests assess small fiber integrity and other tests large fiber integrity. Sudomotor dysfunction as a result of small fibers damage develops early in the course of DM before large fiber damage and sensory loss (9,10,36,37). SWF assesses large fiber function, the Ipswich touch test both small and large fiber function, pinprick and temperature tests assess small fiber function and vibration tests assess large fiber function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of SWM has been shown to predict future development of DFU ( 33 , 40 ) and according to current guidelines is recommended for identification of people with loss of protective sensation and at risk for DFU ( 7 , 8 ). Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that SWM detects advanced large fiber neuropathy and the current recommendation for the assessment of DPN using SWM testing may need to be reconsidered ( 36 , 37 ). A systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that in 3 prospective studies, SWM had a sensitivity 0.66–0.91, a specificity 0.34–0.86, a +PV 0.18–0.39, a −PV of 0.94–0.94, a +LR of 1.4–4.7, and a −LR of 0.3–0.5 ( 33 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%