2014
DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diabetic neuropathy and the sensory apparatus “meissner corpuscle and merkel cells”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13, 14, 33, 34 Changes in MC densities correlate with changes in axon terminals of both myelinated and unmyelinated fibers. 11, 16, 17 Therefore, it stands to reason that MC density in the skin would be a useful marker of early diabetic DSP, a conclusion supported by biopsy studies and expanded upon with the present study. 11, 16, 17 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13, 14, 33, 34 Changes in MC densities correlate with changes in axon terminals of both myelinated and unmyelinated fibers. 11, 16, 17 Therefore, it stands to reason that MC density in the skin would be a useful marker of early diabetic DSP, a conclusion supported by biopsy studies and expanded upon with the present study. 11, 16, 17 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…11, 16, 17 Therefore, it stands to reason that MC density in the skin would be a useful marker of early diabetic DSP, a conclusion supported by biopsy studies and expanded upon with the present study. 11, 16, 17 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…As a consequence of these changes with age, the skin becomes increasingly Results of multivariate analysis showing only significant hazard ratios with the respective 95% confidence interval less able to accommodate an ever-increasing volume of insulin-containing fluid. The lower rate of painful injections may also reflect skin changes with aging, which are typically characterized by progressively higher denervation processes [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vibration signals may also differ between phones due to the addition of phone cases, variability in internal haptic motors, etc. Human vibration mechanoreceptors have a broad sensitivity from 5–800 Hz, with Pacinian corpuscles being responsible for high frequency vibrations and having peak sensitivity at 150–300 Hz [36] , [37] , [38] . The tested smartphone in this work produces a broad-spectrum of frequencies that are within this high sensitivity range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%