2019
DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.04.234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diachronic Political Metaphorology: Linguistic Personology

Abstract: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The view on the metaphor as on one of the ways of representing the background cultural knowledge (implicit, not directly expressed in verbal form, knowledge that is tacitly perceived by the participants in the interaction as "for granted") that makes up the unique national linguistic picture of the world is highly relevant to the modern linguodidactics tendencies based on the principles of communicative-and cultureorientation of FL teaching. The metaphoric studies of Maslova (2016), Kondratyeva and Kameneva (2019), Pimenova (2015) and many other russophone linguists are based on the point (the point of view which is rather distant from the traditional metaphor theories based on Aristotle's conception eхpounded in Rhetorics) that metaphor is a way of perception of the world that uses previously acquired knowledge for comprehending the new objects and phenomenons (Maslova, 2001, p. 91). Moreover, the specific character of metaphor consists in comparing the world with the human scale of knowledge and perceptions and with a system of cultural and national values, which let the metaphors be perceived as a reflection of national picture of the world -historically formed in the consciousness of a certain linguistic collective and reflected in the language, a set of ideas about the world, a certain way of conceptualizing reality, unique for every nation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The view on the metaphor as on one of the ways of representing the background cultural knowledge (implicit, not directly expressed in verbal form, knowledge that is tacitly perceived by the participants in the interaction as "for granted") that makes up the unique national linguistic picture of the world is highly relevant to the modern linguodidactics tendencies based on the principles of communicative-and cultureorientation of FL teaching. The metaphoric studies of Maslova (2016), Kondratyeva and Kameneva (2019), Pimenova (2015) and many other russophone linguists are based on the point (the point of view which is rather distant from the traditional metaphor theories based on Aristotle's conception eхpounded in Rhetorics) that metaphor is a way of perception of the world that uses previously acquired knowledge for comprehending the new objects and phenomenons (Maslova, 2001, p. 91). Moreover, the specific character of metaphor consists in comparing the world with the human scale of knowledge and perceptions and with a system of cultural and national values, which let the metaphors be perceived as a reflection of national picture of the world -historically formed in the consciousness of a certain linguistic collective and reflected in the language, a set of ideas about the world, a certain way of conceptualizing reality, unique for every nation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%