2016
DOI: 10.1306/04011615103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagenetic constraints on heterogeneous reservoir quality assessment: A Triassic outcrop analog of meandering fluvial reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The damage zone has characteristics that vary according to the rock type: 1) For brittle consolidated rocks, in the model of Caine et al (1996) the damage zone is defined as an increased fracture density and contains minor faults compared to the protolith. 2) For porous sandstones, models of the damage zone from Heynekamp et al, (1999) modified by Loveless et al, (2011), include minor faults and deformation bands (Antonellini and Aydin, 1994;Flodin et al, These processes interact with one another, because of their potential co-eval formation (Clauer et al, 2008;Worden and Morad, 2009).They have an impact on the pore network and reservoir quality of sandstones, though their quantification is rarely determined (Bjorlykke and Egeberg, 1993;Bjorkum, 1996;Worden and Burley, 2003;Eichhubl et al, 2009;Henares et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damage zone has characteristics that vary according to the rock type: 1) For brittle consolidated rocks, in the model of Caine et al (1996) the damage zone is defined as an increased fracture density and contains minor faults compared to the protolith. 2) For porous sandstones, models of the damage zone from Heynekamp et al, (1999) modified by Loveless et al, (2011), include minor faults and deformation bands (Antonellini and Aydin, 1994;Flodin et al, These processes interact with one another, because of their potential co-eval formation (Clauer et al, 2008;Worden and Morad, 2009).They have an impact on the pore network and reservoir quality of sandstones, though their quantification is rarely determined (Bjorlykke and Egeberg, 1993;Bjorkum, 1996;Worden and Burley, 2003;Eichhubl et al, 2009;Henares et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studied example is a Triassic succession often considered as an outcrop analogue for other hydrocarbon‐productive reservoirs such as the Algerian TAGI (Trias Argilo‐Gréseux Inférieur; Rossi et al ., 2002; Dabrio et al ., 2005; Viseras et al ., 2011; Henares et al ., 2014, 2016a,b; Viseras et al ., 2018; Yeste et al ., 2018). For this reason, the Outcrop/Behind Outcrop workflow has been employed, integrating standard 2D high resolution outcrop data and 3D outcrop data, developed from photogrammetry, with subsurface data from behind the outcrop including cores and core descriptions, Gamma Ray logs and borehole image logs (Yeste et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occurrence time and duration of deep burial largely control the preservation of pores and reservoir quality [22,23]. The negative effects on reservoir quality by compaction may be inhibited by eogenetic cements such as extensive carbonate cements [17,24]. Porosity enhancing factors, including mainly dissolution of unstable silicate and fracturing, depend crucially on pore fluid chemistry, grain compositions, and structural features (development of fractures, e.g., joints and faults) [19,25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%