The IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iscc.2010.5546808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosability evaluation for a system-level diagnosis algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weber et al [8] propose a strategy of mutual tests among the sensor nodes in a region where t numbers of faulty sensor nodes are present such that the system graph representing the region of the WSNs is t-diagnosable. Weber et al presented a diagnosis approach namely energyefficient test assignment without reciprocal tests [7] which are based on their previous work [8].Chen et al [9] propose and evaluate a localized fault detection algorithm named Distributed Fault Detection to identify the faulty sensors. Mahapatro and Khilar [10] propose an On-line distributed fault diagnosis method called cluster-based distributed fault diagnosis algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weber et al [8] propose a strategy of mutual tests among the sensor nodes in a region where t numbers of faulty sensor nodes are present such that the system graph representing the region of the WSNs is t-diagnosable. Weber et al presented a diagnosis approach namely energyefficient test assignment without reciprocal tests [7] which are based on their previous work [8].Chen et al [9] propose and evaluate a localized fault detection algorithm named Distributed Fault Detection to identify the faulty sensors. Mahapatro and Khilar [10] propose an On-line distributed fault diagnosis method called cluster-based distributed fault diagnosis algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krishnamachari et al have presented a Bayesian fault recognition model to solve the fault-event disambiguation problem in sensor networks [18]. Weber et al [19] consider the problem of determining a test strategy of the sensors in a WSN in order to ensure a desired level of diagnosability of the system. Since the diagnosability of a diagnostic graph depends on whether the graph defines reciprocal tests among units or not, they discuss two strategies namely testing strategy without reciprocal tests and testing strategy with reciprocal tests.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, node 8 marks 10 as hard faulty in F T 8 and node 10 marks 8 as hard faulty in F T 10 . However, node 21 has detected 8 as fault-free and 19 has detected 10 as fault-free. Since 8 , 10 , 19 , and 21 are under same parent node 15 , thus, node 15 rectifies the incorrect decision made by 8 and 10 by comparing the received fault tables.…”
Section: Dissemination Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cluster head takes a decision by comparing the test results sent by its member sensor nodes. Weber et al [14] consider the problem of determining a test strategy of the sensors in a WSN in order to ensure a desired level of diagnosability of the system. Since the diagnosability of a diagnostic graph depends on whether the graph defines reciprocal tests among units or not, they discuss two strategies namely testing strategy without reciprocal tests and testing strategy with reciprocal tests.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%