2002
DOI: 10.2307/4090009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosability versus Mean Differences of Sage Sparrow Subspecies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subspecies traditionally have been based on geographical discontinuities in phenotypic traits, and some authors have prescribed a minimum proportion of morphological differentiation to qualify as subspecies (Amadon 1949;Patten and Unitt 2002). Molecular data has often shown a lack of congruence in traditional morphological subspecies and phylogenetic units.…”
Section: Taxonomic Revision Of Chasiempismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subspecies traditionally have been based on geographical discontinuities in phenotypic traits, and some authors have prescribed a minimum proportion of morphological differentiation to qualify as subspecies (Amadon 1949;Patten and Unitt 2002). Molecular data has often shown a lack of congruence in traditional morphological subspecies and phylogenetic units.…”
Section: Taxonomic Revision Of Chasiempismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, uncertainty regarding which criteria to use for delineating subspecies hampers subspecies listing and delisting decisions. Subspecies have been defined based on phenotypic (e.g., morphological, behavioral, and ecological) and genetic criteria (Mayr 1942;Amadon 1949;Futuyma 1998;Patten and Unitt 2002;Haig et al 2004;Zink 2004). In birds, recent controversy over subspecies delineation has centered on conflicting morphological and genetic patterns (Zink 1989;Ball and Avise 1992;Zink et al 2000;Zink 2004;Phillimore and Owens 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover the demonstration of genetic distinction between subspecies is not a default expectation because genetic exchange might be continuing or might have ceased only recently. Any prevailing concern over the status of subspecies as a taxonomic rank lies not with the concept, populations within a species that are diagnosably distinct (Patten & Unitt 2002) or alternatively diagnosable populations that at least during breeding are largely allopatric (Rising 2007), but with its application in individual cases (Remsen 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong debate among North American ornithologists has centred on the question of whether subspecies should be accepted only if shown [by current methods] to be genetically distinct, with most agreeing that many named a century ago would fail this test, some being ill defined in subjective terms and many merely representing samples along a cline of continuing variation (Patten & Unitt 2002). A minority view is that the use of subspecies serves no good purpose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%