2002
DOI: 10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0026:dvmdos]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosability Versus Mean Differences of Sage Sparrow Subspecies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to a paucity of detailed descriptions, the taxonomic importance of cortical granulation in armophorids is undetermined. A detailed discussion of the subspecies concept is beyond the scope of this paper (Patten and Unitt 2002). However, in our opinion, designation of the North American population as a subspecies on the basis of (2014).…”
Section: Inversus Metopus Striatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to a paucity of detailed descriptions, the taxonomic importance of cortical granulation in armophorids is undetermined. A detailed discussion of the subspecies concept is beyond the scope of this paper (Patten and Unitt 2002). However, in our opinion, designation of the North American population as a subspecies on the basis of (2014).…”
Section: Inversus Metopus Striatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Throughout this paper we follow the definition by Patten and Unitt (2002) of subspecies as a collection of populations in a given geographic range that differ in some fixed way (almost always phenotypically) from other populations but that are not reproductively isolated from one another. For any subspecies whose ranges meet, we expect there to be some level of gene flow; otherwise, we would label the populations as biological species (Mayr and Ashlock 1991).…”
Section: Señales Concordantes Y Discordantes Entre Datos Genéticos Y mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…o. caurina, S. o. occidentalis, and S. o. lucida, the Northern Spotted Owl, California Spotted Owl, and Mexican Spotted Owl. There has been substantial criticism of the subspecies concept (e.g., Wilson and Brown 1953, Selander 1971, Zink 2004, and some response to this criticism (Smith and White 1956, Parkes 1982, Patten and Unitt 2002, but this taxonomic level was included in the U. S. ESA, and the Northern Spotted Owl was originally listed as threatened at this taxonomic level. Thus we address whether existing data support designation of the Northern Spotted Owl as a distinct subspecies.…”
Section: Pair Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amadon (1949) derived the "75% rule" for delineation of subspecies, in which 75% of a population must be distinct or diagnosably different from 75% of the individuals of the other population. Patten and Unitt (2002) proposed formalizing the 75% rule, and provided a quantitative method for determining the validity of subspecies. Under their methods, "to be a valid subspecies 75% of a population must lie outside 99% of the range of other populations for a given defining character or set of characters."…”
Section: Traditional Subspeciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation