Diagnoses of Patients with Severe Subjective Health Complaints in Scandinavia: A Cross Sectional Study

Abstract

Background. A diagnosis is the basis of medical action, the key to various social privileges and national sick leave statistics. The objectives of this study were to investigate which diagnoses general practitioners in Scandinavia give patients with severe subjective health complaints, and what kind of treatments they suggested. Methods. One hundred and twenty-six self-selected general practitioners in Scandinavia diagnosed nine patients, presented as video vignettes, in a cross-sectional study. The main outcome measures were primary, secondary, and tertiary diagnoses. Results. The nine patients got between 13 and 31 different primary diagnoses and a large variety of secondary and tertiary diagnoses. Fifty-eight percent of the general practitioners chose different primary and secondary diagnoses, indicating that they judged the patients to have multimorbid complaints. The most commonly recommended treatment was referral to a psychologist, a mix of psychological and physical treatments, or treatment by the general practitioner. Conclusion. Scandinavian general practitioners give a large variety of symptom diagnoses, mainly psychological and general and unspecified, to patients with severe subjective health complaints. Referral to a psychologist or a mix of psychological or physical treatments was most commonly suggested to treat the patients.

Prioritization and the elusive effect on welfare – A Norwegian health care reform revisited

“…There are at least two reasons that treatment can have a limited effect for non-surgical patients. Some patients have diffuse musculoskeletal pain and symptoms, and it can be difficult to give the correct medical diagnosis (Maeland et al 2012). Treatment is then prone to trial and error without proper medical effect.…”

“…In addition to the lack of clear evidence that treatment reduces length of sick leave, there is also a question of given a correct medical diagnosis as the basis of medical action. Maeland et al (2012) analyse which diagnosis GPs give patients with subjective health complaints, and what kind of treatments they suggested. They find that GPs give a large variety of diagnosis and treatment to the same type of patient, indicating how difficult it can be to give proper treatment to people with diseases of the musculoskeletal system.…”

Naked in the eyes of the public: A phenomenological study of the lived experience of suffering from burnout while waiting for recognition to be ill

“…Research has shown that individuals suffering from medically unexplained syndromes experience not being taken seriously within the health care system and often report disbelief and lack of support from their communities . This fact may cause severe problems for individuals with these syndromes because APP and social security benefits are not readily granted without a known biomedical diagnosis . Issues of legitimacy may in turn contribute to elevated distress and suffering and an aggravation of the physical symptoms .…”

“…Issues of legitimacy may in turn contribute to elevated distress and suffering and an aggravation of the physical symptoms . However, often, the experienced symptoms are attributed to psychological factors leaving these individuals to cope with their situation on their own …”

What constitutes competence? That depends on the task

“…It was based on simulated, video-recorded consultations with a common denominator: a simulated patient presenting so-called subjective health complaints (SHC) to a GP [6]. Such a presumably objective approach to human beings may in itself represent an ethically questionable reduction of both doctors and patients for several reasons [7].…”