2020
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy by 2010 Task Force Criteria: clinical performance and simplified practical implementation

Abstract: Aims Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is diagnosed by a complex set of clinical tests as per 2010 Task Force Criteria (TFC). Avoiding misdiagnosis is crucial to prevent sudden cardiac death as well as unnecessary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantations. This study aims to validate the overall performance of the TFC in a real-world cohort of patients referred for ARVC evaluation. Methods and results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative TFC criteria were derived from a comparison of 108 ARVC probands to healthy controls, in which cut-offs for major criteria were chosen to achieve 95% specificity. Cut-offs with high specificity invariably result in lower sensitivity, which ranged from 17–58% in a recent validation study ( 16 ). In contrast, minor criteria have higher sensitivity (up to 82%) but consequently lower specificity (as low as 67%) ( 16 ).…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Quantitative TFC criteria were derived from a comparison of 108 ARVC probands to healthy controls, in which cut-offs for major criteria were chosen to achieve 95% specificity. Cut-offs with high specificity invariably result in lower sensitivity, which ranged from 17–58% in a recent validation study ( 16 ). In contrast, minor criteria have higher sensitivity (up to 82%) but consequently lower specificity (as low as 67%) ( 16 ).…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cut-offs with high specificity invariably result in lower sensitivity, which ranged from 17–58% in a recent validation study ( 16 ). In contrast, minor criteria have higher sensitivity (up to 82%) but consequently lower specificity (as low as 67%) ( 16 ). Overall, 2 major, 1 major and 2 minor, or 4 minor criteria are required for diagnosis.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Expert interpretation of gene–disease associations and variant pathogenicity is supported by the Clinical Genome (ClinGen) Resource Cardiovascular Working Group ( https://clinicalgenome.org ; [ 41 , 45 , 49 , 60 ]). To determine the likelihood of pathogenicity of a genetic variant and its relation to disease, the following classification has been proposed: pathogenic (class 5: >95%), likely pathogenic (class 4: >90%), variant of uncertain significance = VUS (class 3: 10–90%), likely benign (class 2: <10%), and benign (class 1: <5%) [ 8 , 20 , 49 , 60 , 62 ].…”
Section: Genetic Counseling and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thank Dr Müssigbrodt 1 for his interest in our study and the complex question of arrhythmogenic right centricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) diagnosis. 2 To continue the discussion in this reply, we elaborate on the elements that he found surprising and rectify inaccuracies in his statements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%