2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing Distensible Venous Malformations of the Orbit With Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this study evaluated the feasibility of using quantitative tissue parameters extracted from pre- (PRE-RF) and post-interventional (DELTA-RF) dw-MRI for response prediction to percutaneous sclerotherapy, as diffusion-weighted (dw) imaging with calculation of the apparent diffusion coefficient is a sensitive MRI method to detect venous malformations [ 30 ]. Dw-MRI is influenced by a variety of factors, such as cell density, intralesional thrombosis [ 31 ] or perfusion [ 32 ] and, as shown from data of this study, by sclerosing agents used for percutaneous sclerotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this study evaluated the feasibility of using quantitative tissue parameters extracted from pre- (PRE-RF) and post-interventional (DELTA-RF) dw-MRI for response prediction to percutaneous sclerotherapy, as diffusion-weighted (dw) imaging with calculation of the apparent diffusion coefficient is a sensitive MRI method to detect venous malformations [ 30 ]. Dw-MRI is influenced by a variety of factors, such as cell density, intralesional thrombosis [ 31 ] or perfusion [ 32 ] and, as shown from data of this study, by sclerosing agents used for percutaneous sclerotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study reported that the apparent diffusion coefficient value of VMs was 1.63 ± 0.03 × 10 − 3 mm 2 /s 22 and another study added that the mean apparent diffusion coefficient of distensible orbital VMs was 2.80 ± 0.48 ×10 − 3 mm 2 /s. 25 The difference in apparent diffusion coefficient value between different studies may be attributed to different applied B value, different parameters of the diffusion-weighted MR imaging as well as different composition and regions of VMs. One study reported that vascular lesions such as hemangiomas and VMs revealed high apparent diffusion coefficient value than other benign solid tumors such as neurofibromas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffusion-weighted MR imaging has been widely used in many clinical settings; for evaluation of head and neck cancer, thyroiditis, nasal tumors, 18–20 soft tissue masses and pediatric lymphatic, and VMs. 2125 Recently, diffusion-weighted MR imaging used for differentiation orbital VM from simulating lesions in the orbit. 25 To our knowledge, the relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient of VMs and presence of LIC has not been established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This non-invasive imaging method has a unique sensitivity for the free movement (diffusion) of water molecules in tissues. The apparent diffusion coefficient value of CHM is reportedly similar to that of solid tumors with medium density, which aids in differentiation from cystic lesions (28,29). However, there have been few studies with relevant data and analysis regarding specific apparent diffusion coefficient thresholds for CHM, or regarding further differential diagnosis findings.…”
Section: Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%