2017
DOI: 10.1111/all.13117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing eosinophilic asthma using a multivariate prediction model based on blood granulocyte responsiveness

Abstract: The proposed prediction model identifies eosinophilic asthma without the need for sputum induction. The model forms a noninvasive and externally validated test to assess eosinophilic asthma in patients not on OCS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possibility is that eosinophils in the circulation are heterogeneous in their threshold for response to specific stimuli, with the most “activatable” cells continuously extravasating, leaving the least “activatable” cells in the circulation. Indeed, a recent study demonstrated that blood eosinophils from asthmatic subjects displayed little or no change in αM integrin expression in response to formylmethionine‐leucyl‐phenylalanine (fMLF), whereas sputum eosinophils exhibited a robust increase in αM integrin expression after fMLF stimulation .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another possibility is that eosinophils in the circulation are heterogeneous in their threshold for response to specific stimuli, with the most “activatable” cells continuously extravasating, leaving the least “activatable” cells in the circulation. Indeed, a recent study demonstrated that blood eosinophils from asthmatic subjects displayed little or no change in αM integrin expression in response to formylmethionine‐leucyl‐phenylalanine (fMLF), whereas sputum eosinophils exhibited a robust increase in αM integrin expression after fMLF stimulation .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a recent study demonstrated that blood eosinophils from asthmatic subjects displayed little or no change in aM integrin expression in response to formylmethionine-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLF), whereas sputum eosinophils exhibited a robust increase in aM integrin expression after fMLF stimulation. 42 Along these lines, several studies have suggested the possibility that a small proportion of circulating eosinophils in allergic subjects can be activated in vivo to express the low affinity Fc receptor (FccRIIIa and FccRIIIb) CD16. [43][44][45] In some cases, we did observe a CD16 + "tail" within the CCR3 + blood eosinophil population by FACS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High percentage of sputum eosinophils in asthmatic patients was found to be associated with low or no upregulation of α M integrin or activation of FcγRII (CD32) on blood eosinophils in response to formylmethionine-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLF) in vitro , whereas low sputum eosinophil count was associated with great α M upregulation and CD32 activation in response to fMLF (72). These results indicate that the responsiveness of circulating eosinophils to a chemoattractant is lower in subjects with high sputum eosinophilia.…”
Section: Downregulation In Severe Asthma or After Antigen Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, costs related to comorbidities and the impact of biologics on these factors will be key. The development of biomarkers, prediction models, the design of trials comparing different biologics and the implementation of strategies to investigate the safety, function, and efficacy in children, the elderly, and pregnant women represent additional crucial challenges that need to be answered in the near future.
Gaps in the treatment of allergic disease with biologics How to predict treatment response? Will new biologics help to promote tolerance induction? How to define precision medicine approaches to treat severe and complex atopic phenotypes? Long‐term side effects of biologics? Safety and efficacy of biologics in childhood, in pregnancy, and in elderly? Novel biomarkers and sets of biomarkers will be needed. Treatment algorithms and guidelines for biologics usage are needed.
…”
Section: Unmet Needs and Future Research Areas In Treatment Of Allergmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…193,194 Thus, costs related to comorbidities 195 and the impact of biologics on these factors will be key. The development of biomarkers, prediction models, 5,196 the design of trials comparing different biologics and the implementation of strategies to investigate the safety, function, and efficacy in children, the elderly, and pregnant women represent additional crucial challenges that need to be answered in the near future.…”
Section: Itmentioning
confidence: 99%