2021
DOI: 10.1080/20477724.2021.1896265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing human cutaneous leishmaniasis using fluorescencein situhybridization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in FFPE skin samples from human patients using generic probes for Leishmania spp. different from the one used in the present study [12,36]. Frickmann et al [12] detected L. major/tropica amastigotes in four out of eleven (36%) FFPE skin samples from human patients with a clinical diagnosis of old world cutaneous leishmaniasis (OWCL).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in FFPE skin samples from human patients using generic probes for Leishmania spp. different from the one used in the present study [12,36]. Frickmann et al [12] detected L. major/tropica amastigotes in four out of eleven (36%) FFPE skin samples from human patients with a clinical diagnosis of old world cutaneous leishmaniasis (OWCL).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Frickmann et al [12] detected L. major/tropica amastigotes in four out of eleven (36%) FFPE skin samples from human patients with a clinical diagnosis of old world cutaneous leishmaniasis (OWCL). On the other hand, Kaluarachchi et al [36], using the same generic probes developed by Frickmann et al [12], identified a higher sensitivity (80.9%), compared with HP (50.4%) for the detection of Leishmania amastigotes in FFPE skins from Sri Lankan patients with OWCL caused by L. donovani. These different sensitivity values found by Frickmann et al [12] and Kaluarachchi et al [36], compared with those of the present study, were probably related to the use of FISH with different probes and the diagnosis of positive skin samples for old world Leishmania species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In 2023, Riyal et al, identified a similar staining pattern in L. donovani causing CL for the first time, with a sensitivity of 74% [ 61 ]. While fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is not a common approach in diagnosing CL, applying Leishmania genus-specific FISH probes on FFPE tissue has been shown to improve sensitivity over conventional staining ( Table 3 ) [ 70 ].…”
Section: Direct Parasitological Methods For Diagnosis Of CLmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) allows for the identification and detection of precise DNA sequences or RNA molecules within cells or tissue samples via staining [1,2]. This technique is highly effective in providing researchers with chromosomal and genomic information that aids in the comprehension of gene rearrangements, cytogenetic variation, as well as chromosomal abnormalities and localization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%