2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.07.364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing pleural effusion: A prospective comparison of physical examination with bedside thoracic ultrasonography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies directly compared PE with bedside US for pleural effusion. Five prior studies reported that US was superior [10][11][12][13][14]. However, in at least four of these studies, only auscultation was performed [11][12][13][14], and auscultation is known to be less accurate than other PE maneuvers [5,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Few studies directly compared PE with bedside US for pleural effusion. Five prior studies reported that US was superior [10][11][12][13][14]. However, in at least four of these studies, only auscultation was performed [11][12][13][14], and auscultation is known to be less accurate than other PE maneuvers [5,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, only 60% of medical residents accurately detected bronchial breath sounds [8], such as those that might occur above the level of a pleural effusion [9], with no appreciable increase in auscultation accuracy between 1st year and 3rd year residents [8]. While studies suggest that US outperforms PE for detecting pleural effusion [10][11][12][13][14], many studies used only auscultation as the comparator, rather than a comprehensive PE. Thus, the superior performance of US in these studies may be exaggerated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lists the most common physical signs of pleural effusion [10][11][12][13][14][15] ; TABLE 2 lists some less common (anecdotal) signs. 11,[14][15][16] The sensitivities and specificities of the different signs in detecting pleural effusion have not been extensively studied. The limited data suggest that clinical acumen is less accurate than ultrasonography of the chest, but certain reports found it about as accurate as standard chest radiography.…”
Section: ■ Physical Examination: Long Tradition Few Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patterson et al 11 prospectively compared physical examination (including auscultation, percussion, and tactile fremitus) with bedside ultrasonography and found that physical examination had a lower sensitivity (53% vs 80%, respectively) but a similar specificity (71%).…”
Section: ■ Physical Examination: Long Tradition Few Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation