2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing Rarity in Human-object Interaction Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The training images are used as the gallery set and the testing set is used as the query set. A unique property of the dataset is that 150 interactions have less than 10 examples in the training set, which means a query can only match very few images within the gallery set, leading to a challenging visual search setup [22]. HICO-DET is only used for evaluation.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training images are used as the gallery set and the testing set is used as the query set. A unique property of the dataset is that 150 interactions have less than 10 examples in the training set, which means a query can only match very few images within the gallery set, leading to a challenging visual search setup [22]. HICO-DET is only used for evaluation.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For visual understanding tasks this process becomes more difficult as it is harder to rely on well-defined visual features such as those generated by SIFT [26] features or convolutional neural networks [43]. However some distribution issues can be attributed to the dataset, as seen in the study [16], exploring HICO-DET and some of the multi-stream models covered in this survey. An attempt at the task of zero-shot recognition and weakly supervised learning is seen by Pyere et al in [28], incorporating sematic language information from large text databases that provide probabilities for the interaction in question.…”
Section: Weakly Supervisedmentioning
confidence: 99%