2001
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing TMJ internal derangement and osteoarthritis with magnetic resonance imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
75
1
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
75
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement between clinical and imaging-based diagnosis of disc displacement shows a wide variation amongst previous studies, ranging from 59% to 90% 3,6,7 . The results of this study are in accordance with previous reports that show such a disparity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The agreement between clinical and imaging-based diagnosis of disc displacement shows a wide variation amongst previous studies, ranging from 59% to 90% 3,6,7 . The results of this study are in accordance with previous reports that show such a disparity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Several studies have found that osteoarthritis was not a significant factor in TMJ pain, 1,3-6 whereas joints with osteoarthritis are quite likely related to it. 5,[10][11][12] Osteo-arthritis is present in a large proportion of older people and is usually completely asymptomatic. Symptoms related to temporomandibular dysfunction decrease with age and are often remitting and self-limiting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other seven studies examined the sagittal and coronal views. 1,17,18,[20][21][22][23] Of the eight selected articles, 1,17-23 seven examined ID 1,17-22 (cluster n ¼ 3, single n ¼ 3, both n ¼ 1) and seven examined both IDR and IDnoR 1,17-21,23 (cluster n ¼ 4, single n ¼ 2, both n ¼ 1). All measures within these clusters must be scored positive for the diagnosis to be made, although reporting of the scoring method was not consistently detailed or transparent.…”
Section: Study Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, clusters of tests did not always refer to the same tests. One study, 21 for example, grouped different tests after a mathematical evaluation of the LR. Other authors followed the RDC/TMD (Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders) protocol.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%