2020
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-320290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing urinary tract infection in children: time to ditch the pad?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The growth of pathogens in an uncontaminated urine specimen is the cornerstone for UTI diagnosis [ 16 ]. For this purpose, bladder catheterization and suprapubic puncture are considered the gold standard to collect urine both in infants and in not-toiled trained children [ 2 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The growth of pathogens in an uncontaminated urine specimen is the cornerstone for UTI diagnosis [ 16 ]. For this purpose, bladder catheterization and suprapubic puncture are considered the gold standard to collect urine both in infants and in not-toiled trained children [ 2 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emergency care providers would rather rarely employ bladder catheterization or suprapubic puncture likely because these are personnel and time intensive, and a possible source of pain for children and distress for caregivers [ 17 , 18 ]. New strategies, such as the collection of urine from nappy pad or bladder stimulation technique to obtain midstream urine, might be an interesting and promising alternative [ 16 , 19 ]. We suggest that the emergency units review their practice by considering and validating new urine collection methods for culture that may be effective and safe also in centers with limited staffing and resources, and in small centers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pads appear to be a convenient urine sampling method, preferred by parents and staff, but outside clinical trial settings they have high contamination rates 13 14. Replacing the pad for clean catch is challenging in busy hospital settings and unrealistic in primary care despite ultimately being more cost and time effective for the health economy 13 15. Reassuringly, we did not find non -E. coli bacteria over-represented in pad collection samples compared with clean catch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In the multi-centre DUTY study involving 225 GP surgeries and 7163 children <5 years old in South England and Wales, 50% of urine samples collected were pad samples and 41% were collected in the child’s home 2. Pads appear to be a convenient urine sampling method, preferred by parents and staff, but outside clinical trial settings they have high contamination rates 13 14. Replacing the pad for clean catch is challenging in busy hospital settings and unrealistic in primary care despite ultimately being more cost and time effective for the health economy 13 15.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urinary tract infection (UTI) represents one of the most frequent bacterial infections in children [1]. Escherichia coli (E. coli) is the most often incriminated etiological agent, accounting for 80-90% of UTIs in children [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%