2005
DOI: 10.1136/inpract.27.6.293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis and management of idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease in dogs and cats

Abstract: INFLAMMATORY bowel disease is a common cause of gastrointestinal (GI) signs in dogs and cats. Weight loss, despite an often normal to increased appetite, is a prominent feature. Inflammatory bowel disease is not a specific diagnosis but describes a pathological change that primarily affects the lamina propria (mucosal surface) of the intestinal tract. In approximately 75 per cent of cases no underlying cause of the intestinal inflammation is evident. These animals are deemed to have idiopathic inflammatory bow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
7
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The major problems for missing final diagnoses were poor owner or dog compliance, which are important factors affecting diagnostic and therapeutic success of many forms of chronic enteropathies. 32,33 However, findings of the present study are in line with recent observations suggesting that the impact of excluded cases might only be marginal. e,f, 13 Underlying diseases such as systemic protothecosis and leishmaniosis as well as mechanical disorders, endocrinopathies, and diseases of the liver, kidney, and the cardiovascular system were uncommon causes of chronic diarrhea with frequencies less 1% in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The major problems for missing final diagnoses were poor owner or dog compliance, which are important factors affecting diagnostic and therapeutic success of many forms of chronic enteropathies. 32,33 However, findings of the present study are in line with recent observations suggesting that the impact of excluded cases might only be marginal. e,f, 13 Underlying diseases such as systemic protothecosis and leishmaniosis as well as mechanical disorders, endocrinopathies, and diseases of the liver, kidney, and the cardiovascular system were uncommon causes of chronic diarrhea with frequencies less 1% in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Some dogs were lost to follow‐up as they were presented only once for an initial detailed work‐up and were then treated by their general practitioner. The major problems for missing final diagnoses were poor owner or dog compliance, which are important factors affecting diagnostic and therapeutic success of many forms of chronic enteropathies . However, findings of the present study are in line with recent observations suggesting that the impact of excluded cases might only be marginal ,…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…2931 Current therapy revolves around some combination of dietary modification, prebiotics, antimicrobials, and immunosuppressive doses of corticosteroids that aim to decrease intestinal mucosal inflammation and reduce clinical signs. 32,33 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31] Current therapy revolves around some combination of dietary modification, prebiotics, antimicrobials, and immunosuppressive doses of corticosteroids that aim to decrease intestinal mucosal inflammation and reduce clinical signs. 32,33 Several possible explanations exist for the observed increased risk of dehiscence associated with IBD, including small sample size. Only 4 cases with IBD were identified in our study, with 3 of those cases resulting in dehiscence of the stapled repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common signs of CE include weight loss, recurrent vomiting, or diarrhoea (Kleinschmidt et al 2007). Other clinical signs can be ascites (in relation to hypoalbuminaemia) or mucous paleness in the case of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (German et al 2003;Sturgess 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%