1989
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90309-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis and treatment of adult intussusception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
152
1
12

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
152
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduction has been criticized as to be the cause of spread of tumor cells from the tumoral mass, leading to invagination of the infective material into the peritoneum or dissemination via the venous route. Essentially, reduction is not recommended in cases where the intussusceptied segment is due to a tumorous lesion [1,12]. Since colonic intussusceptions are mostly related to malignant tumorous lesions, reduction is not recommended in such cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduction has been criticized as to be the cause of spread of tumor cells from the tumoral mass, leading to invagination of the infective material into the peritoneum or dissemination via the venous route. Essentially, reduction is not recommended in cases where the intussusceptied segment is due to a tumorous lesion [1,12]. Since colonic intussusceptions are mostly related to malignant tumorous lesions, reduction is not recommended in such cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been controversy associated with the option of preliminary reduction of intussusception before resection verses primary resection without reduction. The theoretic objections to reduction of grossly viable bowel with mucosal necrosis are: 1, intraluminal seeding and venous embolization of malignant cells in the region of ulcerated mucosa [21] . 2, possible perforation during manipulation [5,9] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For colonic intussusception, most recent reports recommend a selective approach to resection, keeping in mind that the site of intussusceptions tends to correlate with the lesion being benign or malignant [9,4] . On the other hand, some authors have recommended a selective approach to resection, taking into consideration the site of intussusception, which influences the type of pathology [4,21] . They advocate resection of all colonic lesions but a more selective approach for small bowel pathology, as the lower malignancy rate for small bowel intussusception makes the argument for initial resection less convincing [19] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The causative lead point can be a benign polyp, lipoma, appendix, Meckel's diverticulum, or malignant tumors such as lymphoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, or primary or metastatic adenocarcinoma [4,5,9]. Most studies reported that 60-80% of enteric intussusception were benign and 50-65% of colonic intussusception were malignancy [2,3,6,9,12,15,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It differs from the childhood condition in its presentations, cause, and treatment [3]. Demonstrable etiology is found in 70-90% of cases of adult intussusception, and approximately 40% of them are caused by primary or secondary malignant neoplasm [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%