2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10353-019-0573-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis and treatment of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A high preoperative HBV viral DNA load in these patients was reported to be an independent risk factor of MVI. The results from the accumulated data demonstrate an important association between the use of preoperative antivirals in HBV-related HCC patients and the incidence of MVI formation and early HCC tumour recurrence (Akateh et al, 2019;Elshaarawy et al, 2019;Ke et al, 2019). Moreover, HCC patients following an antiviral treatment regimen for more than 90 days before surgery was associated with reduced incidence of MVI .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A high preoperative HBV viral DNA load in these patients was reported to be an independent risk factor of MVI. The results from the accumulated data demonstrate an important association between the use of preoperative antivirals in HBV-related HCC patients and the incidence of MVI formation and early HCC tumour recurrence (Akateh et al, 2019;Elshaarawy et al, 2019;Ke et al, 2019). Moreover, HCC patients following an antiviral treatment regimen for more than 90 days before surgery was associated with reduced incidence of MVI .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Unfortunately, the predictive accuracy of preoperative hematological indices is poor. As reported in the review [15], many scholars focus on a single indicator, such as tumor size, PIVKA-II level, or pure hematological/radiological indicators, to construct MVI prediction models, but unfortunately, the practicability and feasibility of these models in clinical practice remains to be further verified. In our prediction model, based on the risk factors derived from hematological data, imaging data, and clinical staging assessment, it achieved a high AUC of 0.7997 (with a sensitivity of 0.685 and specificity of 0.847) and good utility (high H-L goodness of fit, P = 0.231).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic clinical data were age, sex, HBV infection, liver cirrhosis, diabetes, hypertension, and smoking; the preoperative hematological data were carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL), albumin (ALB), and prothrombin time (PT); the preoperative imaging data were tumor diameter, number of tumors, and TNM stage (tumor stage confirmed by imaging examination). Based on the previous literature [8,15], the classification criteria for each candidate index were determined: age (< 60 years or ≥ 60 years), CEA (< 5 ng/mL or ≥ 5 ng/mL), AFP (< 400 ng/mL or ≥ 400 ng/ mL), ALT (< 40 U/L or ≥ 40 U/L), AST (< 34 U/L or ≥ 34 U/L), TBIL (< 34 mmol/L or ≥ 34 mmol/L), ALB (< 33 g/L or ≥ 33 g/L), PT (< 13 s or ≥ 13 s), tumor diameter (< 5 cm or ≥ 5 cm), number of tumors (< 2 or ≥ 3), and TNM stage (I-II, III-IV).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Clinical Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have indicated that anatomical liver resection is the preferred option for patients with a high suspicion of MVI ( 15 , 16 ). If patients have a low risk of MVI, local resection may be selected to reduce the risk of bleeding and infection, improving the short-term prognosis ( 17 ). Therefore, preoperative prediction, intraoperative management, and postoperative intervention for MVI have become research hotspots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%